Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHk-=wiWTU+=wK9pv_YG01rXSqApCS_oY+78Ztz5-ORH5a-kvg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20210510025414.GA2041281@roeck-us.net>
In-Reply-To: <20210510025414.GA2041281@roeck-us.net>
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 10 May 2021 12:01:00 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjsQz-RJzXPu6eeZE+R9m2SH6JoreV6e_mwguitZ5_=zw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 5.13-rc1
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, May 9, 2021 at 7:54 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>
> Qemu test results:
>         total: 462 pass: 460 fail: 2
> Failed tests:
>         arm:raspi2:multi_v7_defconfig:net,usb:bcm2836-rpi-2-b:initrd
>         arm:raspi2:multi_v7_defconfig:sd:net,usb:bcm2836-rpi-2-b:rootfs
>
> The raspi2 problem (a crash in of_clk_add_hw_provider) is well known.
> It was introduced with commit 6579c8d97ad7 ("clk: Mark fwnodes when
> their clock provider is added"). Unfortunately it appears that there
> is still no agreement on how to fix it.

Hmm. I see

    https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20210426065618.588144-1-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com/

and don't see any objections to that version.

Does that fix it for you too?

I'm assuming I'll get that through the usual channels.

> There is also a repeated warning
>
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:550 irq_domain_associate+0x194/0x1f0
>
> in some pxa boot tests. It looks like that problem has been fixed in -next.

Ok, I won't worry about it then.

Thanks,

                 Linus