Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   11 May 2021 07:16:56 +0900
Message-ID: <87k0o6b5ew.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
From:   Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
To:     Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@collabora.com>,
        kernelci-results@groups.io, Heiko Thiery <heiko.thiery@gmail.com>,
        alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
        Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>,
        Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
        Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: broonie-sound/for-next bisection: baseline.bootrr.asoc-simple-card-probed on kontron-sl28-var3-ads2
In-Reply-To: <99b3cd8db134d9682c16784f75f40bae@walle.cc>
References: <6080e82c.1c69fb81.cd60c.2a13@mx.google.com>
        <3ca62063-41b4-c25b-a7bc-8a8160e7b684@collabora.com>
        <877dkp5141.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
        <20210426144242.GF4590@sirena.org.uk>
        <8735vc4r59.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
        <20210427101926.GA4605@sirena.org.uk>
        <ea2b6dae-3087-67d3-8473-410255a51e23@collabora.com>
        <e20b9c8a2715b5d091a8d1f37ba890b4@walle.cc>
        <20210427135703.GH4605@sirena.org.uk>
        <cc9a39f977c3765d1060ab1b0038bc79@walle.cc>
        <a1ec388def4febd9af6ef477245ef2d3@walle.cc>
        <1aa3a8716d2416f0cc127737dcff092a@walle.cc>
        <87o8djcxas.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
        <99b3cd8db134d9682c16784f75f40bae@walle.cc>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk


Hi Michael

> I've just tested your new patches. Unfortunately, it was very
> successful. I've also traced the is_single_links and it is still
> 1 for this board. Is this correct?

Grr, thank you for your test.
is_single_links itself is no problem.
This is name creating timing issue, and indeed posted
patch was still not good.
I'm so sorry to bother you.

Thank you for your help !!

Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto