Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Sender: Guenter Roeck <groeck7@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.11 000/342] 5.11.20-rc1 review
To:     Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
        f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
References: <20210510102010.096403571@linuxfoundation.org>
 <396382a7-9a50-7ea1-53a9-8898bf640c46@linuxfoundation.org>
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Message-ID: <0f93da1a-14c4-8ce8-9afc-eab883a4fa66@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Mon, 10 May 2021 17:01:10 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <396382a7-9a50-7ea1-53a9-8898bf640c46@linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 5/10/21 3:48 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 5/10/21 4:16 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.11.20 release.
>> There are 342 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Wed, 12 May 2021 10:19:23 +0000.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>     https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.11.20-rc1.gz
>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.11.y
>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
>>
> 
> Compiled and doesn't boot. Dies in kmem_cache_alloc_node() called
> from alloc_skb_with_frags()
> 
> I will start bisect.
> 
This is interesting; unless I am missing something, no other testbed
seems to have caught this problem. Do you have a backtrace, by any chance ?

Guenter

> Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
> 
> thanks,
> -- Shuah
>