Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pps: clients: parport: Switch to use
 module_parport_driver()
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        Alexander Gordeev <lasaine@lvk.cs.msu.su>
References: <20210510141302.56654-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <77c821e1-adc7-4088-0dcb-da65ba7a39a2@enneenne.com>
 <YJovqMqJj3mBeRE8@smile.fi.intel.com>
From:   Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>
Message-ID: <55aeec09-63c7-7d1a-13c9-cd8f4b7dc1f9@enneenne.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 May 2021 09:26:36 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <YJovqMqJj3mBeRE8@smile.fi.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 11/05/21 09:18, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 09:05:00AM +0200, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
>> On 10/05/21 16:13, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> Switch to use module_parport_driver() to reduce boilerplate code.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/pps/clients/pps_parport.c | 42 ++++++-------------------------
>>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/pps/clients/pps_parport.c b/drivers/pps/clients/pps_parport.c
>>> index 7a41fb7b0dec..42f93d4c6ee3 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/pps/clients/pps_parport.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/pps/clients/pps_parport.c
>>> @@ -22,8 +22,6 @@
>>>  #include <linux/parport.h>
>>>  #include <linux/pps_kernel.h>
>>>  
>>> -#define DRVDESC "parallel port PPS client"
>>> -
>>>  /* module parameters */
>>>  
>>>  #define CLEAR_WAIT_MAX		100
>>> @@ -138,6 +136,12 @@ static void parport_attach(struct parport *port)
>>>  		.dev		= NULL
>>>  	};
>>>  
>>> +	if (clear_wait > CLEAR_WAIT_MAX) {
>>> +		pr_err("clear_wait value should be not greater then %d\n",
>>> +		       CLEAR_WAIT_MAX);
>>> +		return;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>
>> Why do you need to do so? Maybe a comment would be welcomed.
> 
> It's in original code, I just moved it to ->probe().
> 
> What comment do you want to have here, because original code has no comment (I
> think in any case it's out of scope of this change, but may be prepended or
> appended to the series)?

Mmm... these functions can be called at different times, so I don't know if we
can just move the code safely.

Maybe Alexander (in CC) can help us? :)

Ciao,

Rodolfo

-- 
GNU/Linux Solutions                  e-mail: giometti@enneenne.com
Linux Device Driver                          giometti@linux.it
Embedded Systems                     phone:  +39 349 2432127
UNIX programming                     skype:  rodolfo.giometti