Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp3398426pxj; Tue, 11 May 2021 03:43:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyrNd2R83KOHUDwLegOcd/eEQcGLtklGIAGD9gbBWGjfGK72nd4qpndHIKPY+mz4j6FiL9N X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:13d3:: with SMTP id v19mr24680900ilj.56.1620729813496; Tue, 11 May 2021 03:43:33 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1620729813; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Sg5RK0xbY8xb5s8+aJ5H2AlBj1JjZH0fxlQBEGnD4LgWmxXl068pgEwep53izoO/3j qIY22UEgFRaJ3V0jCNDq+iysWOzgZqAw/XLtz5dqhDVFZlpT7phjD7DKoqHqbxvoV+Cy 6JEClXt3fdldVpPQml7Aq6ESVgamaAs9zB8XzR5FIoip8jpMsPTt2p7U7HkVgadygI23 FxMGihXQxvA9ssyLw4wm7jqf6ZRbDg/75iOv+uWeMYZBHOwyTYbOwKUWBd0mdzqY+tQM r0TEe4P3jjzBJzZr0cZfW0WHLuvJpah2U7CdIQuS5EK0hViOJoEsfoILbVL6n07dfaGy /MZA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:cc:references:to :subject; bh=u9btuZ+vSmuFwWuUrvrnKKgPbGPLFcb6+ADShhbmL3Y=; b=gKjGTLdYK3Pldp9u8exfcAhP9YZnZHzwmqQFIqk0xh1LVLzktASMrf74BMg/iuAI1x H5t9ZxjSEFDcczc/kn6coobcpGnsqBxlc54XEuM6cCuhrW1OMGqBKK9z5zOy1BAOhEW1 1piRGobV5IuajYVm9dIQcEdpqaXvlRcO3VzFJY6RTpfIEXhRXHm9epOJhPBgu3Bip+m4 zykB0lDMXH3JBJ4kGWZVl0CbXHco+ITTCNSPhuNBpoVkwlOhZU3cU3S57FsEzFXoO2u4 gUTgM04NJ6GBCxAf4Y3cZq9xd6tPxfwZ2nzsczY+yOwKZNT4JcFqHgvAooTgGp0b0eln 9Sqg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=hisilicon.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a13si20405890ilf.41.2021.05.11.03.43.21; Tue, 11 May 2021 03:43:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=hisilicon.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230401AbhEKKnz (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 11 May 2021 06:43:55 -0400 Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.35]:2441 "EHLO szxga07-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229892AbhEKKnw (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2021 06:43:52 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS406-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by szxga07-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FfZF00hhlzCqw5; Tue, 11 May 2021 18:40:04 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.40.193.166) by DGGEMS406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.206) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.498.0; Tue, 11 May 2021 18:42:36 +0800 Subject: Question about device link//Re: Qestion about device link To: References: <3c88cf35-6725-1bfa-9e1e-8e9d69147e3b@hisilicon.com> CC: John Garry , , , linux-kernel , , From: "chenxiang (M)" Message-ID: <2e69efb9-a563-251f-2161-5546324a9587@hisilicon.com> Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 18:42:36 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3c88cf35-6725-1bfa-9e1e-8e9d69147e3b@hisilicon.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.40.193.166] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Re-edit the non-aligned flowchart and add CC to Greg-KH and Saravanna. 在 2021/5/11 11:59, chenxiang (M) 写道: > Hi Rafael and other guys, > > I am trying to add a device link between scsi_host->shost_gendev and > hisi_hba->dev to support runtime PM for hisi_hba driver > > (as it supports runtime PM for scsi host in some scenarios such as > error handler etc, we can avoid to do them again if adding a > > device link between scsi_host->shost_gendev and hisi_hba->dev) as > follows (hisi_sas driver is under directory drivers/scsi/hisi_sas): > > device_link_add(&shost->shost_gendev, hisi_hba->dev, > DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME | DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE) > > We have a full test on it, and it works well except when rmmod the > driver, some call trace occurs as follows: > > [root@localhost ~]# rmmod hisi_sas_v3_hw > [ 105.377944] BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/113:1/811/0x00000201 > [ 105.384469] Modules linked in: bluetooth rfkill ib_isert > iscsi_target_mod ib_ipoib ib_umad iptable_filter vfio_iommu_type1 > vfio_pci vfio_virqfd vfio rpcrdma ib_is er > libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi crct10dif_ce sbsa_gwdt hns_roce_hw_v2 > hisi_sec2 hisi_hpre hisi_zip hisi_qm uacce spi_hisi_sfc_v3xx > hisi_trng_v2 rng_core hisi_uncore _hha_pmu > hisi_uncore_ddrc_pmu hisi_uncore_l3c_pmu spi_dw_mmio hisi_uncore_pmu > hns3 hclge hnae3 hisi_sas_v3_hw(-) hisi_sas_main libsas > [ 105.424841] CPU: 113 PID: 811 Comm: kworker/113:1 Kdump: loaded > Tainted: G W 5.12.0-rc1+ #1 > [ 105.434454] Hardware name: Huawei TaiShan 2280 V2/BC82AMDC, BIOS > 2280-V2 CS V5.B143.01 04/22/2021 > [ 105.443287] Workqueue: rcu_gp srcu_invoke_callbacks > [ 105.448154] Call trace: > [ 105.450593] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1a4 > [ 105.454245] show_stack+0x24/0x40 > [ 105.457548] dump_stack+0xc8/0x104 > [ 105.460939] __schedule_bug+0x68/0x80 > [ 105.464590] __schedule+0x73c/0x77c > [ 105.465700] BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/96:1/791/0x00000201 > [ 105.468066] schedule+0x7c/0x110 > [ 105.468068] schedule_timeout+0x194/0x1d4 > [ 105.474490] Modules linked in: > [ 105.477692] wait_for_completion+0x8c/0x12c > [ 105.477695] rcu_barrier+0x1e0/0x2fc > [ 105.477697] scsi_host_dev_release+0x50/0xf0 > [ 105.477701] device_release+0x40/0xa0 > [ 105.477704] kobject_put+0xac/0x100 > [ 105.477707] __device_link_free_srcu+0x50/0x74 > [ 105.477709] srcu_invoke_callbacks+0x108/0x1a4 > [ 105.484743] process_one_work+0x1dc/0x48c > [ 105.492468] worker_thread+0x7c/0x464 > [ 105.492471] kthread+0x168/0x16c > [ 105.492473] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 > ... > > After analyse the process, we find that it will > device_del(&shost->gendev) in function scsi_remove_host() and then > > put_device(&shost->shost_gendev) in function scsi_host_put() when > removing the driver, if there is a link between shost and hisi_hba->dev, > > it will try to delete the link in device_del(), and also will > call_srcu(__device_link_free_srcu) to put_device() link->consumer and > supplier. > > But if put device() for shost_gendev in device_link_free() is later > than in scsi_host_put(), it will call scsi_host_dev_release() in > > srcu_invoke_callbacks() while it is atomic and there are scheduling in > scsi_host_dev_release(), > > so it reports the BUG "scheduling while atomic:...". > > thread 1 thread2 > hisi_sas_v3_remove > ... > sas_remove_host() > ... > scsi_remove_host() > ... > device_del(&shost->shost_gendev) > ... > device_link_purge() > __device_link_del() > device_unregister(&link->link_dev) > devlink_dev_release > call_srcu(__device_link_free_srcu) -----------> > srcu_invoke_callbacks (atomic) > __device_link_free_srcu > ... > scsi_host_put() > put_device(&shost->shost_gendev) (ref = 1) > device_link_free() > put_device(link->consumer) > //shost->gendev ref = 0 > ... > scsi_host_dev_release > ... > rcu_barrier > kthread_stop() Re-edit the non-aligned flowchart thread 1 thread 2 hisi_sas_v3_remove() ... sas_remove_host() ... device_del(&shost->shost_gendev) ... device_link_purge() __device_link_del() device_unregister(&link->link_dev) devlink_dev_release call_srcu(__device_link_free_srcu) -----------> srcu_invoke_callbacks (atomic) __device_link_free_srcu() ... scsi_host_put() put_device(&shost->shost_gendev) (ref = 1) device_link_free() put_device(link->consumer) //shost->gendev ref = 0 ... scsi_host_dev_release() ... rcu_barrier() kthread_stop() > > > We can check kref of shost->shost_gendev to make sure scsi_host_put() > to release scsi host device in LLDD driver to avoid the issue, > > but it seems be a common issue: function __device_link_free_srcu > calls put_device() for consumer and supplier, > > but if it's ref =0 at that time and there are scheduling or sleep in > dev_release, it may have the issue. > > Do you have any idea about the issue? > > > Best regards, > > Xiang Chen > > > > . >