Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp3588708pxj; Tue, 11 May 2021 07:43:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzCDQjEqbEGPByuyKYbUlO/djtlq8LTGK7a/4M2g04lJZ4wZgwfS+8AaIAQlMz5evUlDPic X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:1181:: with SMTP id uz1mr31992688ejb.194.1620744202463; Tue, 11 May 2021 07:43:22 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1620744202; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zmrjYbFe7FDDF3co5BIXnnKKylXiAsFCIttQuNxHZ97+pOgN4a5p0/FJFv5jCr2P66 e9K6t/zGigxoI5GXHfsrGt7Lg4HGLvB4100BuE/bdjhnNcH/mtUvmX0RV8lySuQ+98QW UMZGdU66T92OfCHb9VKATohfnyPrS64Zk8nvLvF95RCdPU7oj/Dxj2BItyfEF0t1S78Y M5p6GRpG9B06jLNiOQNxRp3ki/eagTQyd98aVbr9GDesymugO3PDId8sj6ylGF3Oe6Is 0I0JPcr4iMsFG/C3YAfK7YbftCRxA3ka/ZFmkq+H8IMLs296vFTnQ5QPPiZt3cZmjirY JO2g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-language:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:organization :from:references:cc:to:subject:ironport-sdr:ironport-sdr; bh=4gH3jpuphgoXX/hp6KfVPsN7E8iC8n0H4nOFRSgmO7g=; b=BjoFpPy/4YuD84URWeRD4LrCvmH2+RmCCIOesKMhLu3Sk9h3J5d2GvZJRU5PtomQFH mjAOObDFvekgJSw554GOcvaLHoA90MTW201kCyUlRF52AN4zcRLt2eaKiLyEeoqlffvW RyC7gs5ymf7mrZwKdQPlQmcnd70GYnEnelIEIj6YfCUiW2TVphrSEk7q/+p4LPuBl8CW BVsofZtop0Ix1C9/n0AQr+HsNJoX+MYq4/v4RI9+KiF8mt2nA1tz+KETW9f5J+UBkvMG xswP3S0jqb4am/7HjYMnm33ggB7OGsIub8Ag92yuezh+q+VUX5w2aknNhajvF1GSzpxo fbdQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q16si3027602edd.547.2021.05.11.07.42.57; Tue, 11 May 2021 07:43:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231956AbhEKOks (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 11 May 2021 10:40:48 -0400 Received: from mga17.intel.com ([192.55.52.151]:13086 "EHLO mga17.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231781AbhEKOks (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2021 10:40:48 -0400 IronPort-SDR: 5ADUwAcgzh3D7fqFmoDn/mDxnoXxR5NfjALEgePGnYbgKIzWRshXNToOs358zXXhxt+cbNsY1i GQIfhU/3brsw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,9981"; a="179719378" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,291,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="179719378" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 May 2021 07:39:36 -0700 IronPort-SDR: ckg1dfEy0QxtTIoB19epWyT5EWGKx5kXCQpWVEyNHjn4/wlutx0cXbVmRhtzdF+jGTA7dHAcsA jCDtmzbMz4mA== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,291,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="436687594" Received: from rjwysock-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.249.129.50]) ([10.249.129.50]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 May 2021 07:39:33 -0700 Subject: Re: Qestion about device link To: "chenxiang (M)" Cc: John Garry , linuxarm@huawei.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel , Linux PM References: <3c88cf35-6725-1bfa-9e1e-8e9d69147e3b@hisilicon.com> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Organization: Intel Technology Poland Sp. z o. o., KRS 101882, ul. Slowackiego 173, 80-298 Gdansk Message-ID: Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 16:39:31 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3c88cf35-6725-1bfa-9e1e-8e9d69147e3b@hisilicon.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 5/11/2021 5:59 AM, chenxiang (M) wrote: > Hi Rafael and other guys, > > I am trying to add a device link between scsi_host->shost_gendev and > hisi_hba->dev to support runtime PM for hisi_hba driver > > (as it supports runtime PM for scsi host in some scenarios such as > error handler etc, we can avoid to do them again if adding a > > device link between scsi_host->shost_gendev and hisi_hba->dev) as > follows (hisi_sas driver is under directory drivers/scsi/hisi_sas): > > device_link_add(&shost->shost_gendev, hisi_hba->dev, > DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME | DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE) > > We have a full test on it, and it works well except when rmmod the > driver, some call trace occurs as follows: > > [root@localhost ~]# rmmod hisi_sas_v3_hw > [  105.377944] BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/113:1/811/0x00000201 > [  105.384469] Modules linked in: bluetooth rfkill ib_isert > iscsi_target_mod ib_ipoib ib_umad iptable_filter vfio_iommu_type1 > vfio_pci vfio_virqfd vfio rpcrdma ib_is                         er > libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi crct10dif_ce sbsa_gwdt hns_roce_hw_v2 > hisi_sec2 hisi_hpre hisi_zip hisi_qm uacce spi_hisi_sfc_v3xx > hisi_trng_v2 rng_core hisi_uncore                         _hha_pmu > hisi_uncore_ddrc_pmu hisi_uncore_l3c_pmu spi_dw_mmio hisi_uncore_pmu > hns3 hclge hnae3 hisi_sas_v3_hw(-) hisi_sas_main libsas > [  105.424841] CPU: 113 PID: 811 Comm: kworker/113:1 Kdump: loaded > Tainted: G        W         5.12.0-rc1+ #1 > [  105.434454] Hardware name: Huawei TaiShan 2280 V2/BC82AMDC, BIOS > 2280-V2 CS V5.B143.01 04/22/2021 > [  105.443287] Workqueue: rcu_gp srcu_invoke_callbacks > [  105.448154] Call trace: > [  105.450593]  dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1a4 > [  105.454245]  show_stack+0x24/0x40 > [  105.457548]  dump_stack+0xc8/0x104 > [  105.460939]  __schedule_bug+0x68/0x80 > [  105.464590]  __schedule+0x73c/0x77c > [  105.465700] BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/96:1/791/0x00000201 > [  105.468066]  schedule+0x7c/0x110 > [  105.468068]  schedule_timeout+0x194/0x1d4 > [  105.474490] Modules linked in: > [  105.477692]  wait_for_completion+0x8c/0x12c > [  105.477695]  rcu_barrier+0x1e0/0x2fc > [  105.477697]  scsi_host_dev_release+0x50/0xf0 > [  105.477701]  device_release+0x40/0xa0 > [  105.477704]  kobject_put+0xac/0x100 > [  105.477707]  __device_link_free_srcu+0x50/0x74 > [  105.477709]  srcu_invoke_callbacks+0x108/0x1a4 > [  105.484743]  process_one_work+0x1dc/0x48c > [  105.492468]  worker_thread+0x7c/0x464 > [  105.492471]  kthread+0x168/0x16c > [  105.492473]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 > ... > > After analyse the process, we find that it will > device_del(&shost->gendev) in function scsi_remove_host() and then > > put_device(&shost->shost_gendev) in function scsi_host_put() when > removing the driver, if there is a link between shost and hisi_hba->dev, > > it will try to delete the link in device_del(), and also will > call_srcu(__device_link_free_srcu) to put_device() link->consumer and > supplier. > > But if put device() for shost_gendev in device_link_free() is later > than in scsi_host_put(), it will call scsi_host_dev_release() in > > srcu_invoke_callbacks() while it is atomic and there are scheduling in > scsi_host_dev_release(), > > so it reports the BUG "scheduling while atomic:...". > > thread 1                                                   thread2 > hisi_sas_v3_remove >     ... >     sas_remove_host() >         ... >         scsi_remove_host() >             ... >             device_del(&shost->shost_gendev) >                 ... >                 device_link_purge() >                     __device_link_del() >                         device_unregister(&link->link_dev) >                             devlink_dev_release > call_srcu(__device_link_free_srcu)    -----------> > srcu_invoke_callbacks  (atomic) >         __device_link_free_srcu >     ... >     scsi_host_put() >         put_device(&shost->shost_gendev) (ref = 1) >                 device_link_free() >                               put_device(link->consumer) > //shost->gendev ref = 0 >                                           ... >                                           scsi_host_dev_release >                                                       ... > rcu_barrier > kthread_stop() > > > We can check kref of shost->shost_gendev to make sure scsi_host_put() > to release scsi host device in LLDD driver to avoid the issue, > > but it seems be a common issue:  function __device_link_free_srcu > calls put_device() for consumer and supplier, > > but if it's ref =0 at that time and there are scheduling or sleep in > dev_release, it may have the issue. > > Do you have any idea about the issue? > Yes, this is a general issue. If I'm not mistaken, it can be addressed by further deferring the device_link_free() invocation through a workqueue. Let me cut a patch doing this.