Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 11 May 2021 16:50:51 +0200
From:   =?iso-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Miros=B3aw?= <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
To:     Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Cc:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Robert Yang <decatf@gmail.com>, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] iio: accel: kxcjk-1013: Add support for KX023-1025
Message-ID: <20210511145051.GC4413@qmqm.qmqm.pl>
References: <20210511095409.9290-1-stephan@gerhold.net>
 <20210511142847.GA4413@qmqm.qmqm.pl>
 <YJqWzgmxVEvfElZj@gerhold.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <YJqWzgmxVEvfElZj@gerhold.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 04:38:06PM +0200, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> Hi Micha?,
> 
> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 04:28:47PM +0200, Micha? Miros?aw wrote:
> > On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 11:54:06AM +0200, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> > > KX023-1025 [1] is another accelerometer from Kionix that has lots
> > > of additional functionality compared to KXCJK-1013. It combines the
> > > motion interrupt functionality from KXCJK with the tap detection
> > > from KXTF9, plus a lot more other functionality.
> > When I researched KXTF9 support it occurred to me that the -10xx part is
> > duplicating the information in 'KXyyy' - it seems to be a project number
> > or something. I would suggest to use just 'kx023' prefix for the code
> > and DT but leave the full identification in the comments/description.
> There do seem to be two different KXTF9 from Kionix, a KXTF9-4100 [1]
> and a KXTF9-2050 [2] with separate datasheets. Have you checked if there
> is a meaningful difference between them?

I haven't compared them thoroughly, but the versions seem to differ only
in power consumption (maybe a different manufacturing process?). The
register sets seem the same.

Best Regards
Micha? Miros?aw