Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 11 May 2021 11:05:30 -0400 (EDT)
From:   Nicolas Pitre <npitre@baylibre.com>
To:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
cc:     Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
        Dien Pham <dien.pham.ry@renesas.com>,
        Gaku Inami <gaku.inami.xh@renesas.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: add clock management to the SCMI
 power domain
In-Reply-To: <20210511145349.b3gzogrdhl74oq5o@bogus>
Message-ID: <nnn42849-17s8-25s1-44s2-37o95p872n14@onlyvoer.pbz>
References: <5q88n947-pon-4940-3or6-s54o4r361o5s@onlyvoer.pbz> <20210511145349.b3gzogrdhl74oq5o@bogus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 11 May 2021, Sudeep Holla wrote:

> Hi Nico,
> 
> On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 04:20:36PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > Clocks requiring non-atomic contexts are supported by the generic clock
> > PM layer since commit 0bfa0820c274 ("PM: clk: make PM clock layer
> > compatible with clocks that must sleep"). That means we can have
> > SCMI-based clocks be managed by the SCMI power domain now.
> >
> 
> Looks good to me, I will apply this soon for v5.14.
> I will reply with details once it is applied.

Excellent!
Thanks.


Nicolas