Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp3672280pxj; Tue, 11 May 2021 09:21:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz4qtRrY9HYaPBu4RD3yKCQzhTMxLjZoVKzQ0QG+ILVai/M3M+VWAPcn3HA1wVMfEPv2JU3 X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4241:: with SMTP id m1mr20844087lfl.397.1620750065562; Tue, 11 May 2021 09:21:05 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1620750065; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Dt3tAWB1ZUSO/s7P99bUvODnGQxSWu992USEjfR7Lpsaj3Kn59C3ybAtBFXzz/EQ8w 27AAIj3CQG00NysQTlzCsuUr/BkKNyJO7y41T3YTSKmUXuEx2qXY+H8us/lUMftcb5/h LgrybjDN46RLNzxOCS6/gPa3C8Wm4PRbE6hqOKgI+qRqAwYeBbxuBI9+NQ3Ivv+x72QO xbT4dbElqPpqn/ZY3+lGYxb7c2DA/AKq/A7PeKFbrOUIWdoY0sYrPXC30DsveywU/Gj7 ghITepB3mXPXZv3NUy+M/8R3XPL8HnZKnPak5Q9lGSjomgnDY4lancKn+d82nnbW+Xi3 VKrw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:subject:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:dkim-signature; bh=qGEiJKxfeZlmzsrJW3D8SgKWMOzFWWlWIF4SmeuVBPk=; b=FlINMzFeM+aD4rNavR0gt2O5z2tRTWuZhDHgfvEfhuggbuJ5VfLf5UgqvAar56ASQ5 zowew7tRa9WwNetHfrxJ7I5cr05Zbw9vbkDqT1aIb+vY5kV8f7CWrPWewtJ3xo7qjGfn o6fglXX5ABSsgbM+FLGdHZKXYbQh2NSVkyUR32mRzdn7PEfOEQndFHfSeGxwiDv3axcx 7QBKBb42eLpJrBlPWove/G+UGPBp0PVG6MrubJ3k91lfBtZIKql8utz/Pc73Bw4QDEBR jPJXafrAhPzDjD6rMA+aRylDo4YVaMVtiuav7OBXvNU9fkLggFbVAvj2BVn1jWgCWah8 1bKg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@deltatee.com header.s=20200525 header.b=ntkDNl1Z; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u22si24516863lfu.299.2021.05.11.09.20.34; Tue, 11 May 2021 09:21:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@deltatee.com header.s=20200525 header.b=ntkDNl1Z; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231454AbhEKQR6 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 11 May 2021 12:17:58 -0400 Received: from ale.deltatee.com ([204.191.154.188]:53762 "EHLO ale.deltatee.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230382AbhEKQR6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2021 12:17:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=deltatee.com; s=20200525; h=Subject:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:content-disposition; bh=qGEiJKxfeZlmzsrJW3D8SgKWMOzFWWlWIF4SmeuVBPk=; b=ntkDNl1ZjZzOkVld9EYsyBSR1g ccd5oF9LMU67fzPYv90Fwd4Y1irj0V7v+J2klm0JE5M1ASoPOI1v0sVaTjnacpcS7HVdLPMGZV53T Voce44zY08R7yplObv7E+p1wa3HXD+WtmqJblO81rvwsCCqqF7TCljrzQSVWdPadK8YUd1giXo/Id mQxd8+ma4bxpKkqwsmr5XLNJqp1HOZcmOKxXmN0mc0yd6UeCYgkSE8YEBTkEIOjJLydxxDyOyvbvR mMI1FijYE0fyHBeqo+wH0Wg6i0iNhQohX2tpxc/fQ6jXzWaqfrVm5nJt/xrQzecC6pVVLM788y8OF KTnNa/sw==; Received: from guinness.priv.deltatee.com ([172.16.1.162]) by ale.deltatee.com with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lgV3p-0006e9-2V; Tue, 11 May 2021 10:16:42 -0600 To: Don Dutile , John Hubbard , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org Cc: Stephen Bates , Christoph Hellwig , Dan Williams , Jason Gunthorpe , =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=c3=b6nig?= , Matthew Wilcox , Daniel Vetter , Jakowski Andrzej , Minturn Dave B , Jason Ekstrand , Dave Hansen , Xiong Jianxin , Bjorn Helgaas , Ira Weiny , Robin Murphy References: <20210408170123.8788-1-logang@deltatee.com> <20210408170123.8788-3-logang@deltatee.com> From: Logan Gunthorpe Message-ID: <65ae4aa7-b646-c270-6c51-2e9c686c5f03@deltatee.com> Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 10:16:40 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-CA Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 172.16.1.162 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: robin.murphy@arm.com, ira.weiny@intel.com, helgaas@kernel.org, jianxin.xiong@intel.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, jason@jlekstrand.net, dave.b.minturn@intel.com, andrzej.jakowski@intel.com, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, willy@infradead.org, christian.koenig@amd.com, jgg@ziepe.ca, dan.j.williams@intel.com, hch@lst.de, sbates@raithlin.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jhubbard@nvidia.com, ddutile@redhat.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: logang@deltatee.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on ale.deltatee.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, GREYLIST_ISWHITE,NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/16] PCI/P2PDMA: Avoid pci_get_slot() which sleeps X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 08 May 2019 21:11:16 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on ale.deltatee.com) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021-05-11 10:05 a.m., Don Dutile wrote: > ... add a flag (set for p2pdma use)  to the function to print out what the root->devfn is, and what > the device is so the needed quirk &/or modification can added to handle when this assumption fails; > or make it a prdebug that can be flipped on for this failing situation, again, to add needed change to accomodate. Good idea! Will add. >>     root = NULL; >>  out: >>     pci_dev_get(root); >>     return root; >> } >> EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_get_root_slot); >> >> ...I think that's a lot clearer to the reader, about what's going on here. >> >> Note that I'm not really sure if it *is* safe, I would need to ask other >> PCIe subsystem developers with more experience. But I don't think anyone >> is trying to make p2pdma calls so early that PCIe buses are uninitialized. >> >> >>> + >>> +    if (!root || root->devfn) >>>           return false; >>>         vendor = root->vendor; >>>       device = root->device; >>> -    pci_dev_put(root); > and the reason to remove the dev_put is b/c it can sleep as well? > is that ok, given the dev_get that John put into the new pci_get_root_slot()? > ... seems like a locking version with no get/put's is needed, or, fix the host-bridge setups so no !NULL self pointers. The dev_get is redundant here seeing we hold references to child devices. It was only in the previous code because we were using pci_get_slot() to get the device which did the get for us. Logan