Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 11 May 2021 19:34:49 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <nchatrad@amd.com>
Cc:     linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, mchehab@kernel.org,
        Mukul Joshi <mukul.joshi@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/MCE/AMD: Helper function to check UMC v2
Message-ID: <YJrAOXEcyUvs/WvY@zn.tnic>
References: <20210511152538.148084-1-nchatrad@amd.com>
 <20210511152538.148084-2-nchatrad@amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210511152538.148084-2-nchatrad@amd.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 08:55:37PM +0530, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:

> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/MCE/AMD: Helper function to check UMC v2

The condensed patch description in the subject line should start with a
uppercase letter and should be written in imperative tone:

"x86/MCE/AMD: Add a helper function... "

> Signed-off-by: Mukul Joshi <mukul.joshi@amd.com>
> Reviewed-by: John Clements <John.Clements@amd.com>
> Reviewed-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>

This is all fine and dandy but it needs your SOB too when you send the
patch.

Please read Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst

sections

Sign your work - the Developer's Certificate of Origin
When to use Acked-by:, Cc:, and Co-developed-by:

> +bool is_smca_umc_v2(int bank)
> +{
> +	return (smca_get_bank_type(bank) == SMCA_UMC_V2);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(is_smca_umc_v2);

This addition looks useless when it doesn't have any users.

Also, I'm pretty sceptical this even makes sense to have it exported -
I'm guessing this is for mce_amd.c but I can't say without seeing it in
use.

The same remarks hold true for your patch 3.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette