Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030372AbWJXMBV (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Oct 2006 08:01:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030399AbWJXMBV (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Oct 2006 08:01:21 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:5064 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030372AbWJXMBU (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Oct 2006 08:01:20 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: pci_set_power_state() failure and breaking suspend Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 14:00:04 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linuxppc-dev list , Linux Kernel list , Greg KH , Pavel Machek References: <1161672898.10524.596.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1161672898.10524.596.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200610241400.06047.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1746 Lines: 44 On Tuesday, 24 October 2006 08:54, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > So I noticed a small regression that I think might uncover a deeper > issue... > > Recently, ohci1394 grew some "proper" error handling in its suspend > function, something that looks like: > > err = pci_set_power_state(pdev, pci_choose_state(pdev, state)); > if (err) > goto out; > > First, it breaks some old PowerBooks where the internal OHCI had PM > feature exposed on PCI (the pmac specific code that follows those lines > is enough on those machines). > > That can easily be fixed by removing the if (err) goto out; statement > and having the pmac code set err to 0 in certain conditions, and I'll be > happy to submit a patch for this. > > However, this raises the question of do we actually want to prevent > machines to suspend when they have a PCI device that don't have the PCI > PM capability ? I'm asking that because I can easily imagine that sort > of construct growing into more drivers (sounds logical if you don't > think) and I can even imagine somebody thinking it's a good idea to slap > a __must_check on pci_set_power_state() ... As far as the suspend to RAM is concerned, I don't know. For the suspend to disk we can ignore the error if we know that the device in question won't do anything like a DMA transfer into memory while we're creating the suspend image. Greetings, Rafael -- You never change things by fighting the existing reality. R. Buckminster Fuller - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/