Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp3895334pxj; Tue, 11 May 2021 14:32:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy4Hq2TLAFJSCp3IEDgKHLStOezhTRiYZXWXDOTzKdugOA+2EpkMpyu+LO0ezGu9NGlbs2f X-Received: by 2002:aca:f408:: with SMTP id s8mr23491143oih.101.1620768744801; Tue, 11 May 2021 14:32:24 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1620768744; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=UrX3mTm6bkPZhrsKJB904NZ9C1lu86OR+VxbWd2BfSBNiAVdt3+ZYOU4t4FjibMoYm IKGyE7jb2r5tCgZXMcuWEea6I0UoByRO9yor+bJlO6ee4jKbD4dB2+Rx7BLtchBW23+S kawiN7iVNA2xBScTmA+IJQiV6n74rOmVmubzQmMSg4/ToZ80+JpQbzEDr/4pD+1iXzvM UtdwraDDb2AvsNIyZTFDOrX9nuoLLLYOEcpQg6D6HOH1mFOkvIRJNFUlfDE2vhS8xGBg 9K5QZUGNiWGwVcK8b09uOPR4jwtO++UMkMkpVy8DhtpsCshQlugJ2V9rnIiHqmfhpDIY zouQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=VhpbWdZjgfCICkvBrwzRgO+OhCSaEEqgJucRCUPiUhM=; b=1IIawJ3IvuX+33Daqu8ozp/pUPonjM2r0KRVXq/iH/8lMsuhv7j3OS1eBgafoyBtxy lptAloApViwOPfPZQXlqdspVpdE/wanUtr5h+OQXuXZL584YdjN/kgywzFSP3XpUFV4z VbtQVVWX+ZzUM76I2Xao2QaNgDFfYWxWMBy0X9JGthfNVK1rdYPY4V3r9WMxY6QgwF9c if+amDa5Plw8lzCF0Mjdee3WvY4KCTqsXf09mrzxkB+UXhS33GYhrnDsvyiCHIzZ4wDq Hgn2qYbXAFJ7Qv3bdGCAohOJk9e21X5qCu4IhmcFT/2/ePa6QvaVLvKIWI5Ab3aA6wru rpvQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f2si21005000ots.27.2021.05.11.14.32.10; Tue, 11 May 2021 14:32:24 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229994AbhEKVcL (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 11 May 2021 17:32:11 -0400 Received: from elvis.franken.de ([193.175.24.41]:50509 "EHLO elvis.franken.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229784AbhEKVcK (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2021 17:32:10 -0400 Received: from uucp (helo=alpha) by elvis.franken.de with local-bsmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1lgZy2-0004Ah-00; Tue, 11 May 2021 23:31:02 +0200 Received: by alpha.franken.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5E38BC0E6B; Tue, 11 May 2021 23:13:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 23:13:59 +0200 From: Thomas Bogendoerfer To: Linus Walleij Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski , Rob Herring , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] dt-bindings: gpio: Add devicetree binding for IDT 79RC32434 GPIO controller Message-ID: <20210511211359.GA19043@alpha.franken.de> References: <20210426095426.118356-1-tsbogend@alpha.franken.de> <20210426095426.118356-2-tsbogend@alpha.franken.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 01, 2021 at 02:13:35PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 11:54 AM Thomas Bogendoerfer > wrote: > > > Add YAML devicetree binding for IDT 79RC32434 GPIO controller > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer > > --- > > Changes in v4: > > - renamed to idt,32434-gpio this time for real > > Overall looks good to me. > > > +required: > (...) > > + - ngpios > > Is there a *technical* reason why this is required? > > Can't the driver just default to 32 gpios when not specified? sure, I make it optional. > > + - interrupt-controller > > + - "#interrupt-cells" > > + - interrupts > > Why can't interrupt support be made optional? > > It is fine if the driver errors out if not provided, but > for the bindings this feels optional. I'll make them optional. > Or does the thing break unless you handle the IRQs? no, they could be used just as GPIOs. Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]