Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp3974880pxj; Tue, 11 May 2021 16:41:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJywXHGiIkrXzcsK2IfgQx+xue2iAFcIyEvHqpsmPGrhs69P/RtQAkHmzrQjbwD1+lIn2OML X-Received: by 2002:a9d:10c:: with SMTP id 12mr21121827otu.30.1620776475503; Tue, 11 May 2021 16:41:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1620776475; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Lg5r802TmefP86D7UFeazaU2BX1XI3pWXUziwQL8Td1WQ+p8OBzaTN4ObDbSCEKIhu uUpOFUqdLyhSRdta0Mn0ptmUgJ6AEa4oPXrjp2sJQ3UJ9vgDdAtlreKV4+aOMFJoIb+M AJ476wnNSVd4MTifIUqqOtXdUySyCGh9zIXZ+aCO/LgaZ4rGH5PEHQbMgBefbYj/QBXU DL0uwzKqyciyRazuD32yM0hAIy/FubOlwJcy7sW2VqIIggYw96SRVWxwvdrRXKaYvdYs PHysaSCZb3X/RIuGcjBH7AM4zeqBKIK4/FFXCNpSDAL6yKLxjFxdOUU9lsO7F2xp6EHd 60UA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=gOpQ5i74gX1m6Ox1513DhDpcdI2ulbE5Y9LeFIIdA3Y=; b=P80t26ft3LBdPBmKAJILaG5zRAwbaydrCDqx/X2HJo6HO4wluWjUF7pwYS6fe1M5xn tA4bbEfnJzfDwfS8BEWD2n0dsfFHUFWBP/bmw/PB98XLh72hljs6U1PS3f35kYyZaro/ 0aTCKehtgG+i7NWeVCbmqzeRNTskYz+oI7DUCHm+CI0bVtF8mp6rHo7VzzeOncoCocOY WnOBz74d7uHSP9ggsXesIzpgHXKxDuiGSZCsVq04kHBwg9VeD4n24bey8JDiSNhBtVBq QdYql3/qISux4oU0PRKjbuN20uBMfQWmF5ttztx5wvXD6RYUmsjvLvGxcu5COM5vWWmP 6pNA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.s=korg header.b=hLUpIpjS; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x18si21117914oia.249.2021.05.11.16.41.01; Tue, 11 May 2021 16:41:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.s=korg header.b=hLUpIpjS; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230111AbhEKXlK (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 11 May 2021 19:41:10 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:57936 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230075AbhEKXlK (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2021 19:41:10 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CEB36616ED; Tue, 11 May 2021 23:40:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1620776402; bh=StGQ4zZ+sG3aVDQn1MpkpljgXREKqD6fxuaBEDSUudw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=hLUpIpjSxwdX1nAVP+N0LVLY1lMcui+/l5k4s7PPY993iDcrCDJiORv58ridgFjWj wF7Xs+ficCdWvf9n3xE8QH0AX1CndZ8jg99pk6I8kkslLGbrhvNIDIvE8Ao0cNHD9I umVQBDkgO0C86yyC8U/o7/4epynrz7QOojArhONg= Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 16:40:01 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Mike Rapoport Cc: Anshuman Khandual , Ard Biesheuvel , Catalin Marinas , David Hildenbrand , Marc Zyngier , Mark Rutland , Mike Rapoport , Will Deacon , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid() Message-Id: <20210511164001.7e905659fdbb8a5e190d303a@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20210511100550.28178-5-rppt@kernel.org> References: <20210511100550.28178-1-rppt@kernel.org> <20210511100550.28178-5-rppt@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 11 May 2021 13:05:50 +0300 Mike Rapoport wrote: > From: Mike Rapoport > > The arm64's version of pfn_valid() differs from the generic because of two > reasons: > > * Parts of the memory map are freed during boot. This makes it necessary to > verify that there is actual physical memory that corresponds to a pfn > which is done by querying memblock. > > * There are NOMAP memory regions. These regions are not mapped in the > linear map and until the previous commit the struct pages representing > these areas had default values. > > As the consequence of absence of the special treatment of NOMAP regions in > the memory map it was necessary to use memblock_is_map_memory() in > pfn_valid() and to have pfn_valid_within() aliased to pfn_valid() so that > generic mm functionality would not treat a NOMAP page as a normal page. > > Since the NOMAP regions are now marked as PageReserved(), pfn walkers and > the rest of core mm will treat them as unusable memory and thus > pfn_valid_within() is no longer required at all and can be disabled by > removing CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE on arm64. > > pfn_valid() can be slightly simplified by replacing > memblock_is_map_memory() with memblock_is_memory(). > > ... > > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > @@ -1052,9 +1052,6 @@ config NEED_PER_CPU_EMBED_FIRST_CHUNK > def_bool y > depends on NUMA > > -config HOLES_IN_ZONE > - def_bool y > - > source "kernel/Kconfig.hz" > > config ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210417075946.181402-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com already did this, so I simply dropped that hunk? And I don't think the changelog needs updating for this? > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c > index 798f74f501d5..fb07218da2c0 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c > @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn) > if (!early_section(ms)) > return pfn_section_valid(ms, pfn); > > - return memblock_is_map_memory(addr); > + return memblock_is_memory(addr); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(pfn_valid);