Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp4027629pxj; Tue, 11 May 2021 18:13:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzz2pMl8BL+qzw+7Ub+gtVRObyyGFZur0QVo9hWTDKBKjaf8XeLAHdVzx2vj4tI4Ql7otfO X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:2459:: with SMTP id x25mr11755745otr.127.1620782030970; Tue, 11 May 2021 18:13:50 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1620782030; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Lujy1FuAP27CtPRR69Ws69r46MOfOXgWyrCQZ+L5mmRvxMIg+FDU4cmszNwPfH9C+V 2lAt73LEzXnMhi7LvJBNlwPlOQKlPGL15txiy3W1n+xEEUjorkwu5t7PrCLfdiPosYu1 oKkrrOpgUwL4p2k+TBOXCyRLgDpSqn8UN2mZ3PxnJ+7Pb2hRcXGrxTa+RrVr+HIgOX2Z 8fmb5tltORCKJCZwjPaQydc6nNkyG+S8QFAyVA6uN+FbSTIaQkYDdQjB9vYgclYtMfLt GRO3d9b8Oua9l+i2Lz9mAJyZVNdXHEpGzQYq/Qh+xvlArwmgIiZNNUmeW1INTngctwy9 SBXA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=2XHYod72n/FxcmsGmTOFOIITNZcb4IzBAwEdB+5uVWw=; b=DYhlt2GltRe6sBCVjW/sKR3QBp1J2gCk6ENwYq/oKptEaUWyn3tBRL/vY4JyJRSgSH X6T04vdMK9Wwr4nD6VTQ/f3DhodFyWzfjTBaJ2y0hZNqIMB6wmQgHlvwmocarhUIy/po IHdENQEDd6nmITahLgsV/zyDMC5Xe9pD37HArsBxWPKy6+3tzIq2c7MNzroHIXF9obb7 1mWDZfJLuQw+vESoyRmEjSd5BfeML+NffoHvijD+PIzmxfGn/qYIAQ/wN/yzyf6aVUtA Eh/1LphmQ64VDTZt41yL7Yr89RbL4rKkHjbWzgEa0CCCgLreVTksgd0QdVqmkOXPux46 QCGg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x37si19996301otr.173.2021.05.11.18.13.37; Tue, 11 May 2021 18:13:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229924AbhELBNi (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 11 May 2021 21:13:38 -0400 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:2706 "EHLO szxga04-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229637AbhELBNi (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2021 21:13:38 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS401-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FfxXY178Bz1BLX0; Wed, 12 May 2021 09:09:49 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.174.177.72) by DGGEMS401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.498.0; Wed, 12 May 2021 09:12:27 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] tpm: fix error return code in tpm2_get_cc_attrs_tbl() To: Jarkko Sakkinen CC: Peter Huewe , Jason Gunthorpe , "James Bottomley" , linux-integrity , linux-kernel References: <20210508025444.1977-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" Message-ID: Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 09:12:26 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.177.72] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021/5/10 4:41, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 10:54:44AM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote: >> Fix to return a negative error code from the error handling >> case instead of 0, as done elsewhere in this function. >> >> Fixes: 58472f5cd4f6("tpm: validate TPM 2.0 commands") >> Reported-by: Hulk Robot >> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei > > In the commit message: > > 1. Instead of writing "a negative error code", write -EFAULT. OK, I will change it. > 2. Some explanation of the choice. Do you mean why I choice error code -EFAULT? There's a similar one above this branch. if (nr_commands > 0xFFFFF) { rc = -EFAULT; goto out; } > >> --- >> drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c >> index eff1f12d981a..c84d23951219 100644 >> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c >> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c >> @@ -656,6 +656,7 @@ int tpm2_get_cc_attrs_tbl(struct tpm_chip *chip) >> >> if (nr_commands != >> be32_to_cpup((__be32 *)&buf.data[TPM_HEADER_SIZE + 5])) { >> + rc = -EFAULT; >> tpm_buf_destroy(&buf); >> goto out; >> } >> -- >> 2.25.1 >> >> >> > > Other than that looks good. > > /Jarkko > > . >