Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp4194985pxj; Tue, 11 May 2021 23:24:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwR2ly9Telpp9X7lQ9E+k//cuvBj0Y0XR6fcgvLx4wSwn4eLbdN0D4RdwiCer14STx3TeJz X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2656:: with SMTP id ar22mr4442747ejc.252.1620800645212; Tue, 11 May 2021 23:24:05 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1620800645; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DHzhZjfQhaJpq5UYJbQV5CYXprw/EmnCCvrLlDwUnbMoZVaAQ7LxyS8mz+pxKNN9xA eVxe22fzXgzFDAPX5LaCr/PDirLMlVe3L1H/+zeB0bRkIYT73RzvL7jRjjkBj3XrbY2M 4rXOKR0ChKrq4MP9VmmhMq1N0nyLdc945h1Ttmb6/t7x2d9aVUMC1nYdwz/xazCiDVCZ CcyzLoRohNW/epNqgPxJ6n+rAfhCkX8p8MTmubQmv6mY3U1HwHx4MnUepOymAznZttZe MDFb31Mb9mrFh2Dc7ChtLQ0Ea7CwuRTCxWtqASDXZ+YAq1uucmPuQ/VgjCrBUX6MMLY3 kA7g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=rWe3f2KaV4ucuKOqi1OHFmAX7yggC4XTJ0UGVoiI1EA=; b=HaAkPzCTr7LtdAM5ju44wKtMj7omwHLrI+OyRvQU+9EJD93cJqh1yC+UuOqMCt1e3J k7oOYFpcUnHSf7RoBungFTVEGcCjmkHx48l9/bPDeftcWkUh+jwC0dJ4XR+uVzoh6vFk wIjFx7UcjRi01cWnSyxW+H8c+XhbUuATPWYgMzoTlUVnPqGUl/rXtwjjTD7hIJNiQLC4 p2rk2U9h4aQoGuNA2RjPbufytzOM79rWFNtRuH8kO3FCN2zDwGqgW3dfVr3HQ5i+1uyc Oyimw7bdrYa7IPSaFlmZHNsuWvMLWXg621w1JNP4+x37jFksbravrrdYR4pco6RrnDN3 YX9A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=CBjeWCzb; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q19si18611449edw.48.2021.05.11.23.23.42; Tue, 11 May 2021 23:24:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=CBjeWCzb; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230097AbhELGV6 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 12 May 2021 02:21:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36676 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230109AbhELGV5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 May 2021 02:21:57 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x634.google.com (mail-ej1-x634.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::634]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06A1FC06174A for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 23:20:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x634.google.com with SMTP id j10so6203824ejb.3 for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 23:20:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=rWe3f2KaV4ucuKOqi1OHFmAX7yggC4XTJ0UGVoiI1EA=; b=CBjeWCzb2XWiL/RONCz+Smmcur/f8QhwEMNI9JuhGdO/GTfaD4T62RuWifH2dF1+2K xn8sK92KR8/pdrUVKy+kLKPkGNk9WIkPV9DxVGiE04IEMQuFFAgQi3DWED4S8NifAcAb ljvsECmzQKOhazeXoN4p68WwntXlVwPjpaojDB5JIsi8SFL48lrAYNtIqKOrfAwqZtz7 wJNxN0YUYoIb0Tz34COxJdZjlNWmcpDH5oI/TbguU3MUrnIa4G40i8HDOKIgQQW+5KL/ k98LmOfYw9nvf/rE0TBr8RlDcPtOw5di9HQwH6jobl6aqJQzsws72O5l2m0GE81JFXdz U0qA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rWe3f2KaV4ucuKOqi1OHFmAX7yggC4XTJ0UGVoiI1EA=; b=ZC2Y+rX7mYp+akzkh4oAyeQ7OPqCHVv7rNrGs4LtSvCNQm3ZYKpAOCMhnAqezcPFfS PoegOSK82We4qAg+T4NLXODkCO7lrCom/BFg9Zf8+as9Ik5Di/ZWa0+zs3LEzM2lgYqt QjADtKfXYcmq/ewv7tDJsa1HPQUmJNAp2iATMVyUqm2eiuHhwCaojXSOEz9D7h2AVtnz FhWeBkabav5ROjKtCVzHaUQ0CP3e3cHKnBq6sWAbU8uV7XCYaJ2oSpLy7OPhyHXgY80a Yfa7b4Mxi9aHo/0iRqnsRZn2xOCrYvq2CqA4lKVPVGkfsOxz82H4+haadoWF2Ywh/ttV rQ4A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531I4xRoWFj8zIoCJ/D2HbyZeozi1gX0NpfFK96D3eNnm74kqCyK uGPvA96GFGxKRgSnMU1mxjZM9UWayMCybPHHwm+cRw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:1183:: with SMTP id uz3mr34984199ejb.264.1620800447812; Tue, 11 May 2021 23:20:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <162042787450.1202325.5718541949681409566.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <162042788015.1202325.6094533661799093199.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <20210510161458.00006ac4@Huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20210510161458.00006ac4@Huawei.com> From: Dan Williams Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 23:20:37 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] cxl/mem: Move some definitions to mem.h To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, Ben Widawsky , Linux PCI , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux ACPI Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 8:17 AM Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Fri, 7 May 2021 15:51:20 -0700 > Dan Williams wrote: > > > In preparation for sharing cxl.h with other generic CXL consumers, > > move / consolidate some of the memory device specifics to mem.h. > > > > The motivation for moving out of cxl.h is to maintain least privilege > > access to memory-device details since cxl.h is used in multiple files. > > The motivation for moving definitions into a new mem.h header is for > > code readability and organization. I.e. minimize implementation details > > when reading data structures and other definitions. > > > > Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky > > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams > I'll do these one by one as not sure if you use automated scripts to pick up > (which get confused by any time people do "for patches 1-4 + 7") > Basically I'm fine with all but patch 5... Sounds good. I do use b4 which has the "--apply-cover-trailers" option. So in the future if you do want to apply reviewed-by to the whole series it's sufficient to just reply to the cover letter. > Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron Thanks, Jonathan.