Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Liguang Zhang <zhangliguang@linux.alibaba.com>,
        Jay Fang <f.fangjian@huawei.com>,
        Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com>,
        Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] spi: Assume GPIO CS active high in ACPI case
Date:   Wed, 12 May 2021 18:04:38 +0100
Message-Id: <162083907220.45027.2264909866666593515.b4-ty@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20210511140912.30757-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
References: <20210511140912.30757-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 11 May 2021 17:09:12 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Currently GPIO CS handling, when descriptors are in use, doesn't
> take into consideration that in ACPI case the default polarity
> is Active High and can't be altered. Instead we have to use the
> per-chip definition provided by SPISerialBus() resource.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: Assume GPIO CS active high in ACPI case
      commit: 6b69546912a57ff8c31061f98e56383cc0beffd3

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark