Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] regulator: fan53555: tcs4525 fix and cleanup
Date:   Wed, 12 May 2021 18:04:40 +0100
Message-Id: <162083902381.44966.4390626020202703159.b4-ty@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20210511211335.2935163-1-pgwipeout@gmail.com>
References: <20210511211335.2935163-1-pgwipeout@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 11 May 2021 17:13:32 -0400, Peter Geis wrote:
> The tcs4525 voltage calculation is incorrect, which leads to a deadlock
> on the rk3566-quartz64 board when loading cpufreq.
> Fix the voltage calculation to correct the deadlock.
> While we are at it, add a safety check and clean up the function names
> to be more accurate.
> 
> Peter Geis (3):
>   regulator: fan53555: fix TCS4525 voltage calulation
>   regulator: fan53555: only bind tcs4525 to correct chip id
>   regulator: fan53555: fix tcs4525 function names
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/3] regulator: fan53555: fix TCS4525 voltage calulation
      commit: f8c8871f5eff3981eeb13421aca2c1cfda4a5204
[2/3] regulator: fan53555: only bind tcs4525 to correct chip id
      commit: f9028dcdf589f4ab528372088623aa4e8d324df2
[3/3] regulator: fan53555: fix tcs4525 function names
      commit: b3cc8ec04f50d9c860534fe4e3617a8d10ed9ea9

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark