Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 12 May 2021 15:00:39 -0400
From:   Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To:     linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc:     Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
        Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
        Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs
Message-ID: <YJwl1wNM18trv7px@t490s>
References: <20210427161317.50682-1-peterx@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210427161317.50682-1-peterx@redhat.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 12:12:53PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> This is v2 of uffd-wp shmem & hugetlbfs support, which completes uffd-wp as a
> kernel full feature, as it only supports anonymous before this series.

Ping..

Thinking about a repost, as this series shouldn't be able to apply after we've
got more relevant patches into -mm.  E.g., the full minor fault, and also some
small stuff like pagemap, as we need one more patch to support shmem/hugetlbfs
too.

Hugh, haven't received any further comment from you on shmem side (or on the
general idea).  It would be great to still have some of your input.

Let me know if you prefer to read a fresh new version otherwise.

Thanks!

-- 
Peter Xu