Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 12 May 2021 15:26:05 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc:     Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
        Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>, patches@kernelci.org,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
        linux-stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/244] 5.4.119-rc1 review
Message-ID: <YJwrzVNYg43MrA8V@sashalap>
References: <20210512144743.039977287@linuxfoundation.org>
 <CA+G9fYs1AH8ZNWMJ=H4TY5C6bqp--=SZfW9P=WbB85qSBDkuXw@mail.gmail.com>
 <b7df0d7f-e582-6a0d-2385-b9fce50f9106@arm.com>
 <87h7j7opg2.wl-maz@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <87h7j7opg2.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 06:02:37PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>On Wed, 12 May 2021 18:00:16 +0100,
>Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com> wrote:
>> I made this change to get it to build:
>>
>> $ git diff
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> index dd03d5e01a94..32564b017ba0 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -335,6 +335,7 @@ static inline void kvm_arch_sched_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> int cpu) {}
>> ?static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_block_finish(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>> ?
>> ?static inline void kvm_arm_init_debug(void) {}
>> +static inline void kvm_arm_vcpu_init_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>> ?static inline void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>> ?static inline void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>> ?static inline void kvm_arm_reset_debug_ptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>>
>> which matches the stub for kvm_arm_init_debug(). I can spin a patch
>> out of it and send it for 5.4 and 4.19. Marc, what do you think?
>
>Ideally, we'd drop the patch in its current form from 5.4 and 4.19,
>and send an updated patch with this hunk to fix the 32bit build.

Yes please. I've dropped it from 5.4 and 4.19 and we can queue up a
fixed backport for the next round of releases.

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha