Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030345AbWJYVNw (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:13:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030354AbWJYVNw (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:13:52 -0400 Received: from filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu ([130.245.126.2]:47066 "EHLO filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030345AbWJYVNu (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:13:50 -0400 Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:13:41 -0400 From: Josef Sipek To: lkml@pengaru.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: rename() contention (BUG?) Message-ID: <20061025211341.GB7128@filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu> References: <20061025205634.GB9100@shells.gnugeneration.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061025205634.GB9100@shells.gnugeneration.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 995 Lines: 25 On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 03:56:34PM -0500, lkml@pengaru.com wrote: > Hello, > > I have seen some scalability problems with Maildir-based mail systems running on > Linux (debian sarge, 2.6.8), and after much investigation I found a large part > of the problem was rename() contention. Just FYI, around 2.6.15 the i_sem was replace with i_mutex which is much better/faster. (And I would strongly suggest you upgrade.) I would actually like to know how much the lock contention decresed for your case. (I'm going to read the rest when I get back.) Josef "Jeff" Sipek. -- In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. - Linus Torvalds - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/