Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 13 May 2021 15:44:37 +0200
From:   Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
To:     Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
Cc:     Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@vmware.com>,
        Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
        Norbert Slusarek <nslusarek@gmx.net>,
        Andra Paraschiv <andraprs@amazon.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stsp2@yandex.ru, oxffffaa@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v9 15/19] vhost/vsock: enable SEQPACKET for transport
Message-ID: <20210513134437.xwz5gaulse4jqcmm@steredhat>
References: <20210508163027.3430238-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
 <20210508163634.3432505-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210508163634.3432505-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 07:36:31PM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote:
>This removes:
>1) Ignore of non-stream type of packets.
>This adds:
>1) Handling of SEQPACKET bit: if guest sets features with this bit cleared,
>   then SOCK_SEQPACKET support will be disabled.
>2) 'seqpacket_allow()' callback.
>3) Handling of SEQ_EOR bit: when vhost places data in buffers of guest's
>   rx queue, keep this bit set only when last piece of data is copied.
>
>Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
>---
> v8 -> v9:
> 1) Move 'seqpacket_allow' to 'struct vhost_vsock'.
> 2) Use cpu_to_le32()/le32_to_cpu() to work with 'flags' of packet.
>
> drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
>index 5e78fb719602..3395b25d4a35 100644
>--- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
>+++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
>@@ -31,7 +31,8 @@
>
> enum {
> 	VHOST_VSOCK_FEATURES = VHOST_FEATURES |
>-			       (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM)
>+			       (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM) |
>+			       (1ULL << VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET)
> };
>
> enum {
>@@ -56,6 +57,7 @@ struct vhost_vsock {
> 	atomic_t queued_replies;
>
> 	u32 guest_cid;
>+	bool seqpacket_allow;
> };
>
> static u32 vhost_transport_get_local_cid(void)
>@@ -112,6 +114,7 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock,
> 		size_t nbytes;
> 		size_t iov_len, payload_len;
> 		int head;
>+		bool restore_flag = false;
>
> 		spin_lock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock);
> 		if (list_empty(&vsock->send_pkt_list)) {
>@@ -174,6 +177,12 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock,
> 		/* Set the correct length in the header */
> 		pkt->hdr.len = cpu_to_le32(payload_len);
>
>+		if (pkt->off + payload_len < pkt->len &&
>+		    le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR) {
>+			pkt->hdr.flags &= ~cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR);
>+			restore_flag = true;
>+		}

I think is better to move this code in the same block when we limit
payload_len, something like this (not tested):

		/* If the packet is greater than the space available in the
		 * buffer, we split it using multiple buffers.
		 */
		if (payload_len > iov_len - sizeof(pkt->hdr)) {
			payload_len = iov_len - sizeof(pkt->hdr);

			if (le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR) {
				pkt->hdr.flags &= ~cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR);
				restore_flag = true;
			}
		}

The rest LGTM.