Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 13 May 2021 18:29:51 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Cc:     Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/35] tty cleanup for 5.14
Message-ID: <YJ1T/3PhnVBxJfmV@kroah.com>
References: <20210505091928.22010-1-jslaby@suse.cz>
 <YJ1ACSO+JKRhZZ0/@kroah.com>
 <YJ1RyscrL2bNYXou@hovoldconsulting.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YJ1RyscrL2bNYXou@hovoldconsulting.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 06:20:26PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 05:04:41PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 11:18:53AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > this is again a series of various TTY cleanups. The stats say: 116 files
> > > changed, 661 insertions, 2602 deletions. The major part of the removal
> > > is a drop of BROKEN r3964 ldisc. The rest is mostly removal of dead
> > > code, or adaption to the current tty core state.
> > 
> > I've applied the first 33 patches in this series.  Can you resend the
> > last two after you have revised them based on the review?
> 
> Greg, could you consider dropping the three USB-serial patches from
> tty-testing? They don't have any dependency on the tty changes and we
> can avoid unnecessary merge conflicts if I take them through through my
> tree instead.
> 
> 	USB: serial: make usb_serial_driver::write_room return uint
> 	serial: make usb_serial_driver::chars_in_buffer return uint
> 	USB: serial: digi_acceleport, simplify digi_chars_in_buffer

Sure, I've dropped them from my tree now and pushed out a rebased branch
for 0-day to run on.

thanks,

greg k-h