Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp150905pxj; Fri, 14 May 2021 00:00:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwh/gz7PjrpN9oFfPcWN5f2Xs2j8GclTHPnCZSZxXRh+D+0HMn/G6WvQ6cq9lhhOczKc6S2 X-Received: by 2002:a92:dcc6:: with SMTP id b6mr11606620ilr.224.1620975658918; Fri, 14 May 2021 00:00:58 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1620975658; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NgXXdKw9Fg8zzgUdXqSf/wzKvb8LHlh0XL91jH1K7rOkD/TluOXY+gTRl3j3FZ+R7b 1zSvr4e9lhGSyINNDLEl+Ttevn02zZ9q3AKgV4LrpjeN2d7nFp1kBoUbX+8UOEYFwvwO vkY8Z3YnsOcwnjkKmOsMxEy0RYfAy26wKHOhwn4YhV9fjaAchH79n366hxmKh2dRNFLH DQQypgKVx2UvtDtfgq26vD5QtcVZ7pN2uBVfxMq2dBcLpp/ORVnjxIBr7EfZzRjaw+pF cqxadukJSffbqgevPrNckuXEzXKbSH8ScEw0ApjRWGFd4Iqqn/pWTLb7X0N7ttOvmlI5 XhHw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date:ironport-sdr:ironport-sdr; bh=hAFnh6Sibb/rRwkZnWyrLCD+8Ogb65RARHV8yc+3Qz4=; b=Hx2h8pLqHTHbiLmSdUIXg8vSfLHZ7X7GqNJgog1TWIvYDugzQXy0+WYjrkzhpAcLPS Klqkng+dYicELTauHLQpk0Wk1+FxxaVhcvAK6F9z0cwqsKAMODciHELjKMIwxAbkJgpP yUelQWOclVHOUC+Z0N1kaBB+FqjrNZ3wj4siNsJyy9AWYFl/D36nZp6xYgU7LDm8bqFa 0kDssgjlZ+Oz+S7m5aNcEZD5e1Sfr8DiELt1ZZrUy09ZEGksOzVMQcii2IE9498nY7H4 KFWoBOCdRn8JwnQqfgZRaeDmROFOPaYTUwG3N16hJx02vqJZ5fqrJyjLlaomXu6Rs4Ug Jhsg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l12si5749694ilh.148.2021.05.14.00.00.46; Fri, 14 May 2021 00:00:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231728AbhEMTpI (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 13 May 2021 15:45:08 -0400 Received: from mga12.intel.com ([192.55.52.136]:44989 "EHLO mga12.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230135AbhEMTpH (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 May 2021 15:45:07 -0400 IronPort-SDR: Oe18/mxZYnLMAH7C71pVI/070wpIgrqY9eaj3ErttG9xExAHFqVzdM/l0zO+T9B1IX9DmKn6+f K7oZ2vvklACQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,9983"; a="179631164" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,296,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="179631164" Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 May 2021 12:43:55 -0700 IronPort-SDR: MYq4ex9mgKnk5EcKOTq7+8RvTud/ZpqoO3zsu1Sfq638UTdAq4NuOUXwDaYGC6ya6AliLHrbEH yffHAgTNFcqQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,296,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="431408546" Received: from jacob-builder.jf.intel.com (HELO jacob-builder) ([10.7.199.155]) by orsmga007-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 May 2021 12:43:55 -0700 Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 12:46:21 -0700 From: Jacob Pan To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: "Luck, Tony" , Christoph Hellwig , LKML , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" , Joerg Roedel , Lu Baolu , Jean-Philippe Brucker , "Liu, Yi L" , "Raj, Ashok" , "Tian, Kevin" , "Jiang, Dave" , "wangzhou1@hisilicon.com" , "zhangfei.gao@linaro.org" , "vkoul@kernel.org" , David Woodhouse , jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] iommu/sva: Tighten SVA bind API with explicit flags Message-ID: <20210513124621.01421173@jacob-builder> In-Reply-To: <20210513192014.GU1002214@nvidia.com> References: <20210511194726.GP1002214@nvidia.com> <20210513060012.0fcc7653@jacob-builder> <20210513133834.GC1002214@nvidia.com> <20210513081050.5cf6a6ed@jacob-builder> <20210513173303.GL1002214@nvidia.com> <20210513185349.GA801495@agluck-desk2.amr.corp.intel.com> <20210513190040.GR1002214@nvidia.com> <20210513192014.GU1002214@nvidia.com> Organization: OTC X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Jason, On Thu, 13 May 2021 16:20:14 -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 07:14:54PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote: > > > If you want this then be explicit about what it is you are making when > > > building the API. Don't try to hide it under some generic idea of > > > "kernel PCI DMA SVA" > > > > So, a special API call (that Dave can call from IDXD) to set up this > > kernel PASID. With suitable documentation to explain the scope. > > Maybe with a separate CONFIG option so it can be completely > > stubbed out (IDXD does *NOT* "select" this option ... users have > > to explicitly pick it). > > > > > I could easily see an admin option to "turn this off" entirely as > > > being too dangerous, especially if the users have no interest in > > > IDXD. > > > > And a kernel command line option to block IDXD from using that > > special API ... for users on generic kernels who want to block > > this use model (but still use IDXD in non-kernel cases). Users > > who don't want IDXD at all can block loading of the driver. > > A generic IOMMU API should not be IDXD specific, if you want to allow > some special "integrated to the SOC accelerator PASID" mode then it > should be a global IOMMU API and any security toggles for it should be > global and unrelated to IDXD. > > Concurrently it seems necessary to have a solution for secure kernel > PASID use under the DMA API and reserve this special mode for getting > higher performance. > > I think you need to come with a proposal, and it is a bit alarming a > noteworthy security hole was added under the guise of "kernel SVA" :( > It seems there are two options: 1. Add a new IOMMU API to set up a system PASID with a *separate* IOMMU page table/domain, mark the device is PASID only with a flag. Use DMA APIs to explicit map/unmap. Based on this PASID-only flag, Vendor IOMMU driver will decide whether to use system PASID domain during map/unmap. Not clear if we also need to make IOVA==kernel VA. 2. Add a new IOMMU API to setup a system PASID which points to init_mm.pgd. This API only allows trusted device to bind with the system PASID at its own risk. There is no need for DMA API. This is the same as the current code except with an explicit API. Which option? > Jason Thanks, Jacob