Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422862AbWJZJpD (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Oct 2006 05:45:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422961AbWJZJpD (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Oct 2006 05:45:03 -0400 Received: from ms-smtp-03.tampabay.rr.com ([65.32.5.133]:35580 "EHLO ms-smtp-03.tampabay.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422862AbWJZJpC (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Oct 2006 05:45:02 -0400 Message-ID: <4540839C.6010302@cfl.rr.com> Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 05:45:00 -0400 From: Mark Hounschell Reply-To: dmarkh@cfl.rr.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060725) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel Subject: Another kernel releated GPL ? X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 547 Lines: 12 I make "modifications" to the kernel, then create a user land library to access these "modifications". Obviously my kernel "modifications" are then GPL, but what is the opinion of the kernel developers as far as the license of this library? Does that user land library have to be GPL also? Thanks Mark - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/