Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp256080pxj; Fri, 14 May 2021 02:38:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzg0mTUOq5nP1c0ytdtdxQab4volRPfinYcS/IfANZj86k8PR9LxZm/ygS9q/QG0zMaQSdy X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ccdd:: with SMTP id ot29mr16663437ejb.72.1620985134080; Fri, 14 May 2021 02:38:54 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1620985134; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=foXt015+VXlJITGA+fE++bUyXbCUZARcra/acrfABWzpy/lxah21L2XBeG16z/2jEx 3ACNwKk1WJxts+ei5cXtf7Le3sXevTCzB71Eml1Rfv7hlXeVK1mks9wz0+WgL7pGGZ5E 6hR90uiOo3Q4oyuwN9mXQ98VQ/FV2+7zZNaqSEZmyUD+gsBigWPKAxSXkrKwp0JXnGWm vKS68FB8q7nuF/1oPP5HyTJX0T+1ZuFOkXx6spBeixVyRYDC2xiUAxIVL4xw0e5az8/l PoDZbP346w9Zqp5uebYIaqArf6VH2ZfqcrNaWFhCn8XcwHP+aGTDMexSWUq7BhMIxLiO o1Fg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-language:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=aF6thUY24V0SpGKTRu1zudc3Bmefyt6F5ge5FpS0zPk=; b=j2JqXGP+ntRUGZVxt6bpSiIHGRAyLhg3ZByD64jY3ipLDO/mnyPELNjSzDy6GdPMpJ HYUvRWwJoDnWBom3svQnsqnVi+08jfCHudvygdriX3KXSxbHg7HO91YwFglxNpRJGJqx fa7PohEXsDFyP/oAeOGt+1WAdPumKGAqybwUMbrou80QTxbfFB5lsGfqrfpBQmjR0qMq xSBx/hVYIrbAVIKJ3iYYzyoZWhrTywqdg5OtfRZ81MY4IEIyfvRh8Ng+RVwCvgPVgi5y ihkl7udvafnTFUBHrZJkers2lk0e8FxhmIdlsjhq3tOABixzoKNlK50Wik+Jh5Uwgq58 vloQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v21si3114939edq.476.2021.05.14.02.38.31; Fri, 14 May 2021 02:38:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231218AbhENGOW (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 14 May 2021 02:14:22 -0400 Received: from cmccmta1.chinamobile.com ([221.176.66.79]:52738 "EHLO cmccmta1.chinamobile.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230175AbhENGOV (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 May 2021 02:14:21 -0400 Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.11]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app04-12004 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee4609e14d7a18-42687; Fri, 14 May 2021 14:12:42 +0800 (CST) X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee4609e14d7a18-42687 X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0 X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000 Received: from [192.168.21.77] (unknown[10.42.68.12]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr06-12006 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee6609e14cfa0a-0acc3; Fri, 14 May 2021 14:12:41 +0800 (CST) X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee6609e14cfa0a-0acc3 Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio:adc:ad7766: Fix unnecessary check in ad7766_probe() To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: lars@metafoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@analog.com, knaack.h@gmx.de, pmeerw@pmeerw.net, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Zhang Shengju References: <20210511134739.948-1-tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com> <20210513170334.479953d3@jic23-huawei> From: tangbin Message-ID: <05486432-25ab-0e48-c31b-148049a80732@cmss.chinamobile.com> Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 14:12:45 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210513170334.479953d3@jic23-huawei> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Jonathan: On 2021/5/14 0:03, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Tue, 11 May 2021 21:47:39 +0800 > Tang Bin wrote: > >> In the function ad7766_probe(), the return value of >> devm_iio_device_register() can be zero or ret, Thus it >> is unnecessary to repeated check here. >> >> Signed-off-by: Zhang Shengju >> Signed-off-by: Tang Bin > Hi Tang Bin, > > A quick query on this sign off sequence as I'd like to check what the > intended meaning is. > > If you both developed this patch, please use the Co-developed-by: tag > to indicate that. If Zhang Shengju wrote the patch then you sent it > upstream, please fix the 'from' field on the email to reflect that. > > Patch itself is good. Thanks for your reply, it's my mistake, this place should use:     Co-developed-by: Zhang Shengju Thanks Tang Bin > Thanks, > > Jonathan > >> --- >> drivers/iio/adc/ad7766.c | 5 +---- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7766.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7766.c >> index b6b6765be..acf56e987 100644 >> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7766.c >> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7766.c >> @@ -291,10 +291,7 @@ static int ad7766_probe(struct spi_device *spi) >> if (ret) >> return ret; >> >> - ret = devm_iio_device_register(&spi->dev, indio_dev); >> - if (ret) >> - return ret; >> - return 0; >> + return devm_iio_device_register(&spi->dev, indio_dev); >> } >> >> static const struct spi_device_id ad7766_id[] = {