Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@deviqon.com>
To:     linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     linus.walleij@linaro.org, bgolaszewski@baylibre.com,
        nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp,
        Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@deviqon.com>
Subject: [PATCH] gpio: gpio-visconti: remove platform_set_drvdata() + cleanup probe
Date:   Fri, 14 May 2021 11:55:00 +0300
Message-Id: <20210514085500.10761-1-aardelean@deviqon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

The platform_set_drvdata() call is only useful if we need to retrieve back
the private information.
Since the driver doesn't do that, it's not useful to have it.

If this is removed, we can also just do a direct return on
devm_gpiochip_add_data(). We don't need to print that this call failed as
there are other ways to log/see this during probe.

Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@deviqon.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-visconti.c | 10 +---------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-visconti.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-visconti.c
index 0e3d19828eb1..47455810bdb9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-visconti.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-visconti.c
@@ -187,15 +187,7 @@ static int visconti_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	girq->default_type = IRQ_TYPE_NONE;
 	girq->handler = handle_level_irq;
 
-	ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, &priv->gpio_chip, priv);
-	if (ret) {
-		dev_err(dev, "failed to add GPIO chip\n");
-		return ret;
-	}
-
-	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
-
-	return ret;
+	return devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, &priv->gpio_chip, priv);
 }
 
 static const struct of_device_id visconti_gpio_of_match[] = {
-- 
2.31.1