Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161143AbWJZLpY (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Oct 2006 07:45:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161115AbWJZLpY (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Oct 2006 07:45:24 -0400 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:29075 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161143AbWJZLpX (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Oct 2006 07:45:23 -0400 Subject: Re: Another kernel releated GPL ? From: Alan Cox To: markh@compro.net Cc: dmarkh@cfl.rr.com, linux-kernel In-Reply-To: <45409BFA.8000507@compro.net> References: <4540839C.6010302@cfl.rr.com> <1161861128.12781.28.camel@localhost.localdomain> <45409BFA.8000507@compro.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 12:48:34 +0100 Message-Id: <1161863314.12781.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 (2.6.2-1.fc5.5) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 709 Lines: 16 Ar Iau, 2006-10-26 am 07:28 -0400, ysgrifennodd Mark Hounschell: > I'm sure every lawyer will have his own opinion. In the end won't it come down > to the intent of the kernel developer? Surly the definition of "derivative work" > has to be, or has been already, defined by someone other than a lawyer or court > that knows nothing of "kernel development"? "Derivative work" is a term of law, and it defines the boundaries of copyright in most situations. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/