Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp684298pxj; Fri, 14 May 2021 13:03:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwqvS5WF6nK4Z+0kLnuXTxHL23MP3NErWHRg9DQL/I/5hX7Bakq0cKISBYvGhvfgUsKyjWF X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:640c:: with SMTP id d12mr21675894ejm.70.1621022606333; Fri, 14 May 2021 13:03:26 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1621022606; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=E2Hys5/H//0O9UMwed0EEheh4IeCB8ONYZXtUbhCfsRMlLqpOX6ZNTKY8Akf8+kL9y mzGvNO6/TDmoVikqFxiGHR1OZ9+JAAhnp1lHEE+RtE8IiY47Vy9A+SE4JJx5SGt0fNCu 6aqZADEU2OBitD2FL7aC4dNjuQdqZpulmyqz0HvXzm5CjLu/bdLi9CAqX5BPv2RXResB 2INqQEt5aPnuNQWIElEecMKQGl/fwiIMsjJ7WmsSdtGauT4INfXizvLfsv78Jnc8WHNq 20woBqZAm5Gax6sAcb7GXJkQ9ORk6cO3uDHHXlFCIibBF3Of22K633OWayG6hoAiC1NA CoiQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:dkim-signature:dkim-signature:from; bh=3RJZ0XX14xM21R7lZUKkaNX6VVRciDvkJ2L8b2qH9qQ=; b=SagiNb2x35iVkVU0OPlZ2AEV/32Guj4NxoYrfbpycyMCIWQKuwAZFOyANEcUiB2MeU pwgBh58u4ML3MiWfnE3P3UqfArGZQq6SGavi2uxkY1ipeGDgyhONUFquTthPlP6NxyoS itUTz/a0TuIWI0EHlM3VhoRxBwYhzG4o3Xi3B5aWBFwywroh3qSimn/XM3XBLGHZVPSy UEiKmOgk3jiaV4BsMxTsCIMuspm7Ao1eJQYVpufmyy03coNd9m3XU+Ur23C+1fP+6CtQ ycnxIigszakiX4BnBThzFJlHYrDlAYiYVMJw2jYtLYwin69CmOQ6Oc5c2+UW/12QAH8G JnPQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=NM7jyIp9; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020e header.b=NSRaJBxw; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f6si6846877edt.152.2021.05.14.13.03.01; Fri, 14 May 2021 13:03:26 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=NM7jyIp9; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020e header.b=NSRaJBxw; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235110AbhENReI (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 14 May 2021 13:34:08 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:38202 "EHLO galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232394AbhENReH (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 May 2021 13:34:07 -0400 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1621013574; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3RJZ0XX14xM21R7lZUKkaNX6VVRciDvkJ2L8b2qH9qQ=; b=NM7jyIp9oak0LJEU6gjUrH7Bzvy+CrfWo6sfuI1FGJTf27TJi6MWwZ8GTvCWdMqYs46b+M FWaqQYJI3W8VZwxK9JcmHNT4709BESFWaRwgOA7JdZMJ7KXmzDmDP3h6npegW4y1Nj2hZJ kRaSC0L0G3TzSIqaVOSz/MHiErs3DGPggnRoaMCJW+NjQXLw8ggiQaHNonk5gnM48dDTHI 2PC1e9KqDilKYbiUWxioKQNAqWnujXEoHGJnzhGgsK3YfB5zXzlINtm9NyLR5k5GO6MC59 oeaV0iNNFG516GtAXqkaZ2UoXZ1anY7xhqdhOEfOLn5V0zx5pHzvYb0k6XrTog== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1621013574; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3RJZ0XX14xM21R7lZUKkaNX6VVRciDvkJ2L8b2qH9qQ=; b=NSRaJBxwjaaI6RAdX71Q+v4ctm/IH03z0eVZxmn5WwOfWwHCt8TRdNoM9mxGX/JNHlyC6h uXOw5YSYqjl8P3Dg== To: Maximilian Luz , Sachi King , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , David Laight Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , "x86\@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" , "stable\@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/i8259: Work around buggy legacy PIC In-Reply-To: <5c08541a-2615-f075-a189-0462f1005007@gmail.com> References: <20210512210459.1983026-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com> <3034083.sOBWI1P7ec@yuki> <5c08541a-2615-f075-a189-0462f1005007@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 19:32:54 +0200 Message-ID: <87im3l43w9.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 14 2021 at 13:58, Maximilian Luz wrote: > On 5/14/21 9:41 PM, Sachi King wrote: > I'd assume that _some_ sort of interrupt setup is done by the BIOS/UEFI. > The UEFI on those devices is fairly well-featured, with touch support > via SPI and all. Furthermore, keyboard (also supported in the device's > UEFI) is handled via a custom UART protocol. Unless they rely on polling > for all of that, I believe they'd have to set up some interrupts. Polling would be truly surprising. > Although, as you mention later on, that could also be handled via the > IOAPIC and the PIC is actually not supposed to be used. Maybe some > legacy component that never got tested and just broke with some new > hardware/firmware revision without anyone noticing? And since Linux > still seems to rely on that, we might be the first to notice. That's a valid assumption. As I said, we can make IOAPIC work even w/o PIC. I'll have a look how much PIC assumptions are still around. Thanks, tglx