Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp742542pxj; Fri, 14 May 2021 14:53:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxWhQjBb9RVnpD7k2msfNKHdDGStKSPEtSYEl37b87w7soIEri8DcrMuN4goS7awXvVu/XQ X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:dc8:: with SMTP id p8mr50296146eji.75.1621029236893; Fri, 14 May 2021 14:53:56 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1621029236; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OiBIIxsB6L43zOeaaOh1u+6ihanbzSQKwJK2k8/z5qBJI++pnfTubbqabwfez8w6Eu He+3M+MUAOWt7wYevEzAkijnaBlE70i20E+KtTw4xgvWuOGSefZey1dcL3NpDj9ATRDF 9s2La+aHoaJlyZhd8KA9bnMyDD9oslxH4hRrzWRsOgO52W2iICcTlhd1PgGihLEe15T3 NfVmj38P2ltmSU37y0CKzuQMEpzuOr1KhmnT1mlJRBCdcKHuAQRE0oy9aSz452W719iH 8Qjk8/yg2H2Gz+/7apN3b3zShs1Kk5xAzoeHEmKnamFpsMgjqp+mN/X8ylNvw7KFHDeD DzEg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=N0HEQSFhlLVeE04vzjdXsi7ubwQI0W6A2N9C7eJAHuc=; b=wJujzWo0j0cb/nMcyRgU4dQHcYw5CboTWEvZt8eKsEXJytJ8dkkltItlJ29VFrumHd I9ZwQa6F5NEAZeQjJKo0DwCkocmQImIQnOG2vioA970EQezy6G4L1/N4ucf6eIQAXNPv dsrEkkC2w6w9a8he/IUfKXXP0mlHU7U9dbIiroqzXb88WaKSVSJJHz8/2x6xCA+XAldg 8SOXKI0+mWY8Zgnd+rbWZbZdktmKFNe4dMWv7GcRg85lCHOqJmsBehvXbPvIGxzrQpcT mZGcPF8MSuT/7qtjIHptiG14AWwLyMnGAoWvVQl0EDCxrmAZOIz71cNvXoBLUJdLFkTd PR1Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=EKiwz62p; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id kb7si325431ejc.342.2021.05.14.14.53.34; Fri, 14 May 2021 14:53:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=EKiwz62p; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234412AbhENObi (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 14 May 2021 10:31:38 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:41364 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230141AbhENObh (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 May 2021 10:31:37 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52DDE6144A; Fri, 14 May 2021 14:30:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1621002626; bh=cVKN89jy54XBxo7mbdNUEkDVIEVc5l44VDPutDRAdro=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=EKiwz62p8TsvPeBC8c+eTJ0ZEj7i/hJVD14Fb/UFzGe9bvtb/CA9P4TenTtNTAxwh oggBfBiJbxoWsCJUsVBPBVvNzPznEIojyCztm5s174/G5mIGY3hJXndfXBP3LDyQ8E dELuuLmhCOIes//fKW3qd6NZsvaTp4+x0g0Uu664= Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 16:30:23 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Shreyansh Chouhan Cc: pure.logic@nexus-software.ie, johan@kernel.org, elder@kernel.org, greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: fix gb_loopback_stats_attrs definition Message-ID: References: <20210514133039.304760-1-chouhan.shreyansh630@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 07:53:57PM +0530, Shreyansh Chouhan wrote: > On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 04:05:32PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 07:18:38PM +0530, Shreyansh Chouhan wrote: > > > On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 03:36:25PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 07:00:39PM +0530, Shreyansh Chouhan wrote: > > > > > The gb_loopback_stats_attrs macro, (defined in loopback.c,) is a > > > > > multiline macro whose statements were not enclosed in a do while > > > > > loop. > > > > > > > > > > This patch adds a do while loop around the statements of the said > > > > > macro. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Chouhan > > > > > --- > > > > > drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c | 10 ++++++---- > > > > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c > > > > > index 2471448ba42a..c88ef3e894fa 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c > > > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c > > > > > @@ -162,10 +162,12 @@ static ssize_t name##_avg_show(struct device *dev, \ > > > > > } \ > > > > > static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(name##_avg) > > > > > > > > > > -#define gb_loopback_stats_attrs(field) \ > > > > > - gb_loopback_ro_stats_attr(field, min, u); \ > > > > > - gb_loopback_ro_stats_attr(field, max, u); \ > > > > > - gb_loopback_ro_avg_attr(field) > > > > > +#define gb_loopback_stats_attrs(field) \ > > > > > + do { \ > > > > > + gb_loopback_ro_stats_attr(field, min, u); \ > > > > > + gb_loopback_ro_stats_attr(field, max, u); \ > > > > > + gb_loopback_ro_avg_attr(field); \ > > > > > + } while (0) > > > > > > > > > > #define gb_loopback_attr(field, type) \ > > > > > static ssize_t field##_show(struct device *dev, \ > > > > > -- > > > > > 2.31.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Did you test build this change? > > > > > > I built the module using make -C . M=drivers/staging/greybus to test > > > build it. I didn't get any errors. > > > > Really? Can you provide the full build output for this file with your > > change? I don't think you really built this file for the obvious > > reasons... > > I ran make -C . M=drivers/staging/greybus > > I got a three line output saying: > make: Entering directory '/work/linux' > MODPOST drivers/staging/greybus//Module.symvers > make: Leaving directory '/work/linux' > > I just tried rebuilding the kernel with CONFIG_GREYBUS=m, and now I can > see what you are talking about. Why weren't these errors reported when I > ran the previous make command? Does that too check for the config > variables even when I specifically asked it to build a module? You were just asking it to build a subdirectory, not a specific individual file, and when you do that it looks at the configuration settings. It's always good to ensure that you actually build the files you modify before sending patches out. thanks, greg k-h