Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp871262pxj; Fri, 14 May 2021 19:15:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy5EFwSYZrZ9x9KyDMgZRLC/ZezPXnStsF3cb50AKSYCJp9RzNdOTGZpp5jDj820GQHOypB X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:5106:: with SMTP id m6mr59830973edd.212.1621044956397; Fri, 14 May 2021 19:15:56 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1621044956; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=yT8eyqnZ6OoA0aKi520JBLochiMNAhaQ8a22Otc9LaC2knIZN8XOuIFhWiXSIOykQA CjWgSp0S/JcNYMKGX19zSbT35MhyL0N+NfZCQlTVMw8+7/RAXmc0FPhOKwsOcqI2J7g/ kxVJqhKNdnLqOfMxVqAaTg61fcZpPl3YzeBfloEgrPSQ/EsAU6HxdpBhzfnn5P7skNzU xmTiRYYInSNBVwRqZ4U6VQQELU0ICOhyQXruVJr7rkNXrM5KPYM0+BTEBrsZngdnX8aW lwbKpwhixtkZ+NN8vq234QutMjmKEcjPwkLkz58v+0nyySTKcI2yMKk/1xx9s9/A1l9L 9onA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature:dkim-filter; bh=sz5jkjvMgb5V+JAn9gd2Tb1fSB3vWOyxs+Bvq6ZrCvE=; b=LQkEIaWWnalmZEhNVVRigH6FgepK6PvGwbacDezK34I3a+9tPv0xRtf9LKaWLJ4lOx hsyepARA0+mMuzRMpJGrXNV36rnm3AXtAWRUdzOGqbYkwn9Qx8qjv9oP3dIGNBRpC4L4 mYdKkW20GjHfBBJJyK29Je1fzEROf2AcX2/tj92fvBq6ZhnvbVPW7oPEskOyyO4zgPbl FaLZsztC/D+bYwKSBI4cBWhIS3U7oyCY7mf7Q6nBQK6r7Oew8wOFrhKrhHU9y0T39rws 2JSalNTWrWXEGjugFtSpPtwY8F4lqgxn8g1pvGLVDHfZq8RSALkSNNu6hAmc8/jNs6w7 fsdw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@zytor.com header.s=2021042801 header.b=kTSrLr1+; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=zytor.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z13si7590757edc.21.2021.05.14.19.15.33; Fri, 14 May 2021 19:15:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@zytor.com header.s=2021042801 header.b=kTSrLr1+; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=zytor.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233426AbhENRhc (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 14 May 2021 13:37:32 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.136]:56311 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231849AbhENRhc (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 May 2021 13:37:32 -0400 Received: from tazenda.hos.anvin.org ([IPv6:2601:646:8602:8be0:7285:c2ff:fefb:fd4]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.zytor.com (8.16.1/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 14EHa2me3150421 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 14 May 2021 10:36:02 -0700 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.zytor.com 14EHa2me3150421 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zytor.com; s=2021042801; t=1621013763; bh=sz5jkjvMgb5V+JAn9gd2Tb1fSB3vWOyxs+Bvq6ZrCvE=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=kTSrLr1+lF7XDQSL31hJsRtYDkJWw2YU6shJw0j9SaSDZIuUeFKMsgxBC5jC1cYId y6IdnDXkuVnhmgqWYWtFNMMJv94s6ZzUd1y4zIenuOh2d0AOz0OgtachRtwJXu9qn6 UdXWa2LCJGcTEJSpBVZ/YAJNGfpN0o4XjvnlP65TOeKALa4XHUGgEI+vD8pexNksw8 Ka6iudGeCDMT3Gb9uwO6wabYVUUZAtrJjXFnPhcztcWhQelO2DiL6O+B+k6sO/1Yma t15M29Qxyl1c6fxMoLGHO+6IPDOP4oUN5cpqt0ihng/2SsfpJidLHwy/mU83EW4tn/ Zk+YkegxPwhFg== Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/i8259: Work around buggy legacy PIC To: Thomas Gleixner , Maximilian Luz , Sachi King , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , David Laight Cc: "x86@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" References: <20210512210459.1983026-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com> <3034083.sOBWI1P7ec@yuki> <5c08541a-2615-f075-a189-0462f1005007@gmail.com> <87im3l43w9.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> From: "H. Peter Anvin" Message-ID: Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 10:35:57 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87im3l43w9.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 5/14/21 10:32 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > That's a valid assumption. As I said, we can make IOAPIC work even w/o > PIC. I'll have a look how much PIC assumptions are still around. > As far as I read, the problem isn't actually the absence of a PIC (we definitely boot systems without PICs all the time now), but rather that the PIC is advertised in ACPI but is buggy or absent; a similar platform with different firmware doesn't have problem. If my understanding of the thread is correct, it's quirk fodder. -hpa