Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp871282pxj; Fri, 14 May 2021 19:15:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy9T/aQmJ7yxKcELBtYqEJ3ijwRRFERPXgZBVMB2z0bN27vHvydOd73ZQSiuFI6OekkisRv X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3494:: with SMTP id v20mr58545577edc.169.1621044959295; Fri, 14 May 2021 19:15:59 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1621044959; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=orh2he0Vz7KzuvnRdCT8xXrhBjuzcYPYDY0uXJazk7LpzaSBNnvFKKmLOoqtCVRkEX BtUWUHe5lz2kq92aW/2IcT/R1D3t+a9+m/9N7T0IPcCoJeP2OQFY9dREXxpf04I6K8A9 UygXmTSnDK2lFmOLca9CkkWM9gwo5xNzl33Ews7o7uq27XFa5ocCmZjaL4cpw/EVmEJe TBWBplkTs1hMMHGrQ35q9/KMWQlPX6I3iVuNa0yRW+BgKzss3avExeFCdSkC+G9O+o3e 9YM41iF4kF10DKagz0qPlqypbYkG4Z/ijQTkMA5w9OOtECyNN2jVnOsfY7cFGoj5NeW1 F31w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :message-id; bh=XTxZ3dwgb8I6ANUTGtHaQe0Np/gm4TiunBcW/KPNH0I=; b=fRoE6e48hIE64L4/RYXWWzL3FpK3Cl78LtYXqcplT7u5ilkLxoryCQg6OR5UPOhbGY IHrHHZzcHoH7lH756MaYGHjMqxb5glJtL7ZoHE1dPShwUgpEsJmIGhga8hDFkjbUM56j CXkSeu7jF38WJHy+mwNrujlzJWvrB/ltHxwE7X+EpTe+dMYk+Ty3rz2g0fiVCyKqzdGh rzvTDfmNXjgZnkvtSPT093jSNJ9lccZgAyO9LWUIIGItMPoa2lxaTy9HXP/Z7kzjNTNi /K9Q/Tr1hRUgWTBmXR9geileBpG4bjCQ2V8Yr4r6sPXxn5dRMQmJYs9C4s9fjdvpVlVC Wu6g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ec2si7723383ejb.189.2021.05.14.19.15.36; Fri, 14 May 2021 19:15:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235177AbhENRkN (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 14 May 2021 13:40:13 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0173.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.173]:58652 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230487AbhENRkN (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 May 2021 13:40:13 -0400 Received: from omf17.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net [216.40.38.60]) by smtprelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 710E4100E7B42; Fri, 14 May 2021 17:39:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [HIDDEN] (Authenticated sender: joe@perches.com) by omf17.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D0AF127DD36; Fri, 14 May 2021 17:38:59 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <7cc30a8a6644bb60e5f3358e89253d9fc783fe54.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/e820: Use pr_debug to avoid spamming dmesg log with debug messages From: Joe Perches To: Jason Baron , Heiner Kallweit , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 10:38:58 -0700 In-Reply-To: <5a416031-ddcd-7ef4-ec33-47134bf064bb@akamai.com> References: <6d55670d-2f06-d768-699f-5a79cece6ce0@gmail.com> <59985635-665b-773f-de8f-b15fe3f60196@gmail.com> <1789b1da-7a0f-9fc9-6ed2-ff68e2306342@akamai.com> <204a99e1-de7a-4434-0932-45f1b507e9ec@gmail.com> <5a416031-ddcd-7ef4-ec33-47134bf064bb@akamai.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.1-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.39 X-Rspamd-Server: rspamout05 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D0AF127DD36 X-Stat-Signature: zncc8s658w5jrhh4wga878pkkrtggy83 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Session-ID: U2FsdGVkX1+LWHGGfrT5j+QHl9ZY+J10lcSgt4UtBVI= X-HE-Tag: 1621013939-940429 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2021-05-11 at 17:31 -0400, Jason Baron wrote: > That said, I do see the value in not having to open code the branch stuff, and > making pr_debug() consistent with printk which does return a value. So that > makes sense to me. IMO: printk should not return a value.