Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp1317876pxj; Sat, 15 May 2021 10:37:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzqeW/cUvQUMs8rJgc9YE2opJY15Z4612DRLVr2gbxVEHfgsBwmy+fEoKVV4KuafQiC57dY X-Received: by 2002:aa7:dbc9:: with SMTP id v9mr61689405edt.183.1621100265675; Sat, 15 May 2021 10:37:45 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1621100265; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0ZyWj+gQCyHxX5TNIS2gEUHVJDVUBAqYAlZT+A3hAiNDEAnD7/EeHquA8PcSXCQR/1 dCZdpIt9uTnC/PbBw9L30I+6Q+ZwvV+dtcb+6JFdqwqzYyc5sPhpgtbLKvCny18B0ypO QG0B5mPnfg0n6Gqn6yreh+5jSrTlBOkarfu5MYTpf1e+LdY9fQ9211Wwbs6OmEOkHOsX mirXQwBkP5Xurp8lspVDdlRUtraJlTQFi/CaHaW9s3dENAY/vZXfExjezMFLWGuObXua GJzXEZwHy2St+dcvzI6vJczUB5r2wkYyX7/cUk1ERFBV857bPfDb2+Mv/wEOkuUlFvxr nbuQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :message-id; bh=7SwX++DPSPx0t91S5rxf8Iw/BpiybNBfRkDTVUAoHbQ=; b=LNNlGcB27a0Zjg9ynYlPIJp1aPfKgr3tnyLXDFZLw38Rfq/pFqIFopt2B8vAYJhRro LMCfYrneRhDBvEhCtTNcRnB1Z7y+1XGH/+LwPzZcjZWgOsul6wQFrxfbItR2Wfme3HG9 h7hawRoB0SpXUUB9s5bwDZaNBZQ1SlqAH0fgBzk4wZ/vlBG4N8tAdTBB12SkJ6RorT8S sXwPQxca2zpMVtfYAj2g+gmFMR7l2lpa0BsQdeQluz36aed/KmYdAHbugwgYYSnGPKpk hGoU9uH8K36CtHWXx8fMmlzulaSRi2LAhHoDXP0m2ctIaJvegXhgaYc9RUItTimkyMeb pILA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t2si8799748edd.569.2021.05.15.10.37.22; Sat, 15 May 2021 10:37:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232336AbhEOG4w (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 15 May 2021 02:56:52 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0114.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.114]:44462 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229943AbhEOG4w (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 May 2021 02:56:52 -0400 Received: from omf10.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net [216.40.38.60]) by smtprelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D571800AC96; Sat, 15 May 2021 06:55:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [HIDDEN] (Authenticated sender: joe@perches.com) by omf10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1A7DD2351F4; Sat, 15 May 2021 06:55:37 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4f757b9bab4c9575f0257db6b9ed5a75419a3420.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: add declare_ to declaring macros From: Joe Perches To: Greg KH , Shreyansh Chouhan Cc: pure.logic@nexus-software.ie, johan@kernel.org, elder@kernel.org, greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 23:55:36 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <20210515034116.660895-1-chouhan.shreyansh630@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.1-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.40 X-Stat-Signature: 7auarewnqardbaqc4w55mhyxtzkjhgpj X-Rspamd-Server: rspamout04 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 1A7DD2351F4 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Session-ID: U2FsdGVkX1+gFUlaiLQi2Cj5HT380ymyZQO+RTOUjn4= X-HE-Tag: 1621061737-853347 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2021-05-15 at 07:33 +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 09:11:16AM +0530, Shreyansh Chouhan wrote: > > Prefixed the names of all the macros that were used for declaring things > > with 'declare_'. This should help with clarifying about what these > > macros do. > > Thanks, but I think I will leave the code as-is. It's a good "test" for > people who try to modify the code without actually building it :) This improves the code for the human reader. I think wherever reasonable, code should be improved. In any case, it's a test as checkpatch will emit the same message.