Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v4 01/28] net: mdio: ipq8064: clean
 whitespaces in define
To:     Jonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li>,
        Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20210508002920.19945-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
 <YJbSOYBxskVdqGm5@lunn.ch> <YJbTBuKobu1fBGoM@Ansuel-xps.localdomain>
 <20210515170046.GA18069@earth.li>
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <747555da-cc9b-299f-39dd-9b3368bd467d@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 15 May 2021 10:03:03 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/78.0 Thunderbird/78.10.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210515170046.GA18069@earth.li>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 5/15/2021 10:00 AM, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 08:05:58PM +0200, Ansuel Smith wrote:
>> On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 08:02:33PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 02:28:51AM +0200, Ansuel Smith wrote:
>>>> Fix mixed whitespace and tab for define spacing.
>>>
>>> Please add a patch [0/28] which describes the big picture of what
>>> these changes are doing.
>>>
>>> Also, this series is getting big. You might want to split it into two,
>>> One containing the cleanup, and the second adding support for the new
>>> switch.
>>>
>>> 	Andrew
>>
>> There is a 0/28. With all the changes. Could be that I messed the cc?
>> I agree think it's better to split this for the mdio part, the cleanup
>> and the changes needed for the internal phy.
> 
> FWIW I didn't see the 0/28 mail either.I tried these out on my RB3011
> today. I currently use the GPIO MDIO driver because I saw issues with
> the IPQ8064 driver in the past, and sticking with the GPIO driver I see
> both QCA8337 devices and traffic flows as expected, so no obvious
> regressions from your changes.

The cover letter somehow appeared as the final patch in the submission
instead of having all patches in-reply-to it as one would expect.

Russell had some additional feedback that came in during or after the
patches being applied so it would be nice to address that.

> 
> I also tried switching to the IPQ8064 MDIO driver for my first device
> (which is on the MDIO0 bus), but it's still not happy:
> 
> qca8k 37000000.mdio-mii:10: Switch id detected 0 but expected 13

If you do repeated reads of the revision register to you eventually get
13 as intended?
-- 
Florian