Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Khaled ROMDHANI <khaledromdhani216@gmail.com>
To:     peterz@infradead.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com, jbaron@akamai.com,
        rostedt@goodmis.org, ardb@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
        mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com
Cc:     Khaled ROMDHANI <khaledromdhani216@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH-next] x86/kernel: Fix unchecked return value
Date:   Sat, 15 May 2021 21:22:12 +0100
Message-Id: <20210515202212.24836-1-khaledromdhani216@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

From the coverity scan analysis, the return value from
insn_decode_kernel is not checked. It is a macro constructed
from the insn_decode function which may fail and return
negative integer. Fix this by explicitly checking the
return value.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Unchecked return value")
Signed-off-by: Khaled ROMDHANI <khaledromdhani216@gmail.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/jump_label.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/jump_label.c b/arch/x86/kernel/jump_label.c
index a762dc1c615e..bf0ea003b6e7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/jump_label.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/jump_label.c
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ int arch_jump_entry_size(struct jump_entry *entry)
 {
 	struct insn insn = {};
 
-	insn_decode_kernel(&insn, (void *)jump_entry_code(entry));
+	WARN_ON(insn_decode_kernel(&insn, (void *)jump_entry_code(entry)));
 	BUG_ON(insn.length != 2 && insn.length != 5);
 
 	return insn.length;
-- 
2.17.1