Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 11 Nov 2001 00:00:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 11 Nov 2001 00:00:15 -0500 Received: from rtlab.med.cornell.edu ([140.251.145.175]:49035 "HELO openlab.rtlab.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 11 Nov 2001 00:00:01 -0500 Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 00:00:00 -0500 (EST) From: "Calin A. Culianu" To: Petro Cc: Subject: Re: Machine Crash--Can someone decipher this for me? In-Reply-To: <20011109170857.I22434@auctionwatch.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org You should probably resolve those symbols present in your cpu registers so that people here can help you! :) -Calin On Fri, 9 Nov 2001, Petro wrote: > > About 10 minutes ago we had one of our DB machines crashed, and I > really need to find out why. > > Symptoms were that we lost connectivity on the Gig-E port, things > were *really* slow accessing the 100bT port (different network), so > I grabbed the Serial console to try and troubleshoot. This very soon > stoped responding, so I had to power-cycle the box. > > We'd been playing with the box all day testing a new configuration > (we are migrating a DB from an e4500 to this machine). > > Here is the log file: > > Nov 9 16:33:21 dbgsh01 kernel: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 8fab6104 > Nov 9 16:33:21 dbgsh01 kernel: printing eip: > Nov 9 16:33:21 dbgsh01 kernel: c01087da > Nov 9 16:33:21 dbgsh01 kernel: *pde = 00000000 > Nov 9 16:33:21 dbgsh01 kernel: Oops: 0002 > Nov 9 16:33:21 dbgsh01 kernel: CPU: 1 > Nov 9 16:33:21 dbgsh01 kernel: EIP: 0010:[do_IRQ+42/236] Not tainted > Nov 9 16:33:21 dbgsh01 kernel: EFLAGS: 00010093 > Nov 9 16:33:21 dbgsh01 kernel: eax: cf792580 ebx: 000002a0 ecx: 0000011a edx: 0858ba10 > Nov 9 16:33:21 dbgsh01 kernel: esi: c0303aa0 edi: 00000015 ebp: d9a63d1c esp: d9a63d08 > Nov 9 16:33:21 dbgsh01 kernel: ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018 > Nov 9 16:33:21 dbgsh01 kernel: Process xml_search_pull (pid: 2901, stackpage=d9a62000) > Nov 9 16:33:21 dbgsh01 kernel: Stack: 40156368 08597564 0858bff4 d7f2229d 081a28b0 bffff45c c010a8f4 40156368 > Nov 9 16:33:21 dbgsh01 kernel: 0000011a 0858ba10 08597564 0858bff4 bffff45c 00000a4c c010002b 0000002b > Nov 9 16:33:21 dbgsh01 kernel: ffffff15 400b51d7 00000023 00010206 bffff454 0000002b ffffffff 0000000a > Nov 9 16:33:21 dbgsh01 kernel: Call Trace: [call_do_IRQ+5/13] [vsnprintf+991/1056] [reschedule_idle+533/540] [wake_up_parent+29/48] [do_notify_p arent+178/188] > Nov 9 16:33:21 dbgsh01 kernel: [__mmdrop+35/40] [do_exit+557/564] [sys_exit+14/16] [system_call+47/52] > Nov 9 16:33:21 dbgsh01 kernel: > Nov 9 16:33:21 dbgsh01 kernel: Code: ff 84 b8 30 3b 32 c0 f0 fe 8b 10 38 30 c0 0f 88 a3 60 14 00 > Nov 9 16:35:58 dbgsh01 kernel: <5>nfs: server cart2-1 not responding, still trying > Nov 9 16:36:12 dbgsh01 kernel: nfs: server cart1-1 not responding, still trying > > Hardware: VALinux 2200 dual CPUs, 2 gig ram. > Netgear GA620 > IBM 9gig HD on /dev/sda (using Adaptec aic7896/97 Ultra2 SCSI adapter) > 3ware 64xx card with 2 75 Gig IDE drives. > > Kernel: 2.4.13-ac8. Using Acenic driver .83 for GA620. EEpro1.09 for > onboad 100bT. > > I suspect that something caused the Acenic driver to, go bad. > > Is this a case of "upgrade to the lastest version (IIRC .84) and > hope it doesn't happen again", or am I barking down the wrong > branch? > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/