Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 18 May 2021 09:49:01 +0100
From:   Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To:     John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        YongQin Liu <yongqin.liu@linaro.org>,
        Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: REGRESSION: kernel BUG at arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c:157!
Message-ID: <20210518084900.GA7412@willie-the-truck>
References: <CANcMJZDOMZVj6WVEe+7b--Rwkdg1-WVFfHkVm4KR-ykS4LxQFQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CANcMJZDOMZVj6WVEe+7b--Rwkdg1-WVFfHkVm4KR-ykS4LxQFQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

Hi John,

On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 02:52:59PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> With v5.13-rc2, I've been seeing an odd boot regression with the
> DragonBoard 845c:
> 
> Unfortunately, trying to bisect it down (v5.13-rc1 works ok) is giving
> me inconsistent results so far. It feels a bit like maybe some config
> option gets enabled moving forward, and then sticks around when we go
> back.  I'll take another swing at bisecting it later today, but I have
> to move on to some other work right now, so I figured I'd share (with
> folks who better know the recent __apply_alternatives changes) in case
> folks have a better idea:

Please can you try reverting af44068c581c and 0c6c2d3615ef?

Thanks,

Will