Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751093AbWJ1Gfd (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Oct 2006 02:35:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751108AbWJ1Gfd (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Oct 2006 02:35:33 -0400 Received: from teetot.devrandom.net ([66.35.250.243]:63872 "EHLO teetot.devrandom.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751093AbWJ1Gfd (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Oct 2006 02:35:33 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 23:35:24 -0700 From: thockin@hockin.org To: Andi Kleen Cc: Sergio Monteiro Basto , Lee Revell , Chris Friesen , linux-kernel , john stultz Subject: Re: AMD X2 unsynced TSC fix? Message-ID: <20061028063524.GA7669@hockin.org> References: <1161969308.27225.120.camel@mindpipe> <1161986902.27225.206.camel@mindpipe> <1162007907.26022.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200610272106.13115.ak@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200610272106.13115.ak@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 651 Lines: 14 On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 09:06:12PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > So far, has I can understand. Seems to me that my computer which have a > > Pentium D (Dual Core) on VIA chipset, also have unsynchronized TSC and > > with the patch of hrtimers on > > Intel systems (except for some large highend systems) have synchronized TSCs. Does Intel guarantee that, or is that just what we happen to see, so far. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/