Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp1676268pxj; Wed, 19 May 2021 11:13:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwDcwE8A6cXpT3q+Se8g3py/iH4RAVCY9g0ULTi4nINwYNrNia5td6uVzNE94TrDUr0AVD0 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:5b0:: with SMTP id k16mr215499ils.293.1621447985225; Wed, 19 May 2021 11:13:05 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1621447985; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=u0GCUdW7L7JMvu2ntrTkNk7jA/4UE1VfIIBm61rkDMeEtDYkKJBfkTT7VZVMdfhFKs r8zWPAamkv4O7jS6+UwXh2p0attNudM5EkbFk/BFlcJ8/IZkAmlRyB4etE8kmWql25Rl N48jLJqLPq/FoF0oikJ475u14sVJb14dPTy9hpfEvmOS9/br8eovaPw2ofANA/Az6VBi znW/THg0yarUHg2dZo2ZTWvCOStnxXM+OSdU7cb5gUrx8uWej2/HjtTbD8J+V5G7HpBl lq6QE9ehwFU9zCq3KQYQHolZJUfoZ1JeDiKO2xf8Yk8oTiFjtjCstABzKZHLuvdGUZNC 1faQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature :dkim-signature; bh=wgrrsLoj4Unfv9rO+Z97PvhymNnAksc3e14zYpEaaIo=; b=PGgcayZOvpQgRMIp8biSJST/vF7SmxI7zDy0mgglu36y2AJBnpSQDZSw29rXrGYUeE fVOO2RI9YJUW42o7kf2wpu+KMntQ+7JddeZmGyUT3n4/LNhCFLR7dCZXPpFLOBqE94B/ LIMfgB8tZni9Hul7C6wftS2nf9BdgNS6+z8oPuBGoaauwGYXVn77cZb8Xbt5xFVcdDcW Zxxkny0FV5qSOtTPM3/htnNXm8eKufmUgw8jfarlEY/drSm6RWsnaBdhNI0xRwUKaOYe 3YoZEd3bxgkQfDuVGfhs6IJcqjVkhLX+0qcYyXH/dELlNHeVVJ4HaWPrP6qVGgIeaQ9O NprQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kroah.com header.s=fm3 header.b=gLMk2gy3; dkim=pass header.i=@messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=LsgcTb8A; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a10si354632ilv.110.2021.05.19.11.12.53; Wed, 19 May 2021 11:13:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kroah.com header.s=fm3 header.b=gLMk2gy3; dkim=pass header.i=@messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=LsgcTb8A; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1349672AbhERNff (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 18 May 2021 09:35:35 -0400 Received: from wnew2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.27]:48565 "EHLO wnew2-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1349539AbhERNfe (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 May 2021 09:35:34 -0400 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailnew.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6481813A3; Tue, 18 May 2021 09:34:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 18 May 2021 09:34:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kroah.com; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=wgrrsLoj4Unfv9rO+Z97PvhymNn Aksc3e14zYpEaaIo=; b=gLMk2gy3pEdHNYtopPSu/wie58FMREv3VXf4GnJfkeV ibg7K0kVYY1AfgT8cyQ8q+1Jae/Mu/KlDFWiqnt/MNntRdr24qPrhBGoHiFWfLIi vNTJnFpT+Jk6siP9eGD8b0IC3PA5DLhp0n2SBFZX6b7DwkjTnyTCwlIeh5aaEmJu IBkT5QTP7OEz5pECePv/ka44k9JVDrYRuZ0vN/KUljSJX2o2tGBjlgiVbxsX9IKy 4FqYM6YpaCrCAgqxx+J2ZDNg7TmQtPbAmI1wLQx4VGMgvRIOZIKatrIFJIDQqb1/ cPFTKb1abMyCI7acLR9msPT5vE4Ic3mPIUC709JYdSQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=wgrrsL oj4Unfv9rO+Z97PvhymNnAksc3e14zYpEaaIo=; b=LsgcTb8A20y58XE3hYh6AD z2ce8sD59CEW0KbvKF64wc92oM+g2BE92ema/xck6Paf8N24ybB31rH6gpVIjuU6 HDmetafe0KHM7JiFKfKwBzhdfPQKRj2ATcgCw9lxpBAuwjUUbqrnEQYAwnZfNkIn dTeid5bI9+51sBMgWyQamn0jvVnUhOzWFrdIBwAov9WSEHoX1ftdZR+xmdrNSpme +Jm0RUTwPKhEXBtGLfCOYga/LsLEieA92rZWi7Kk9rXPvUGwGzWWxDb++KkRjELA SY3x3iUKz+SRMed34L6SXDamAINB2SJTlpHCNR75Ck0H+xOQJYmi/7SvEuHUQ19g == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdeijedgieehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefirhgvghcu mffjuceoghhrvghgsehkrhhorghhrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeevueehje fgfffgiedvudekvdektdelleelgefhleejieeugeegveeuuddukedvteenucfkphepkeef rdekiedrjeegrdeigeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrih hlfhhrohhmpehgrhgvgheskhhrohgrhhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (83-86-74-64.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.74.64]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 18 May 2021 09:34:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 15:34:11 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Sasha Levin Cc: Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , stable , Tetsuo Handa , syzbot , dri-devel , Linux Fbdev development list Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.12 5/5] tty: vt: always invoke vc->vc_sw->con_resize callback Message-ID: References: <20210518010940.1485417-1-sashal@kernel.org> <20210518010940.1485417-5-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 09:22:48AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 07:45:59AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 06:35:24PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 6:09 PM Sasha Levin wrote: > > > > > > > > From: Tetsuo Handa > > > > > > > > [ Upstream commit ffb324e6f874121f7dce5bdae5e05d02baae7269 ] > > > > > > So I think the commit is fine, and yes, it should be applied to > > > stable, but it's one of those "there were three different patches in > > > as many days to fix the problem, and this is the right one, but maybe > > > stable should hold off for a while to see that there aren't any > > > problem reports". > > > > > > I don't think there will be any problems from this, but while the > > > patch is tiny, it's conceptually quite a big change to something that > > > people haven't really touched for a long time. > > > > > > So use your own judgement, but it might be a good idea to wait a week > > > before backporting this to see if anything screams. > > > > I was going to wait a few weeks for this, and the other vt patches that > > were marked with cc: stable@ before queueing them up. > > I'll drop it from my queue then. Thanks!