Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964769AbWJ1Tmt (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Oct 2006 15:42:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932106AbWJ1Tmt (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Oct 2006 15:42:49 -0400 Received: from teetot.devrandom.net ([66.35.250.243]:221 "EHLO teetot.devrandom.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932101AbWJ1Tms (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Oct 2006 15:42:48 -0400 Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 12:42:45 -0700 From: thockin@hockin.org To: Willy Tarreau Cc: Andi Kleen , Lee Revell , Luca Tettamanti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, john stultz Subject: Re: AMD X2 unsynced TSC fix? Message-ID: <20061028194245.GA24083@hockin.org> References: <1161969308.27225.120.camel@mindpipe> <1162006081.27225.257.camel@mindpipe> <20061028052837.GC1709@1wt.eu> <200610281137.22451.ak@suse.de> <20061028191515.GA1603@1wt.eu> <20061028191800.GA20701@hockin.org> <20061028193217.GD1709@1wt.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061028193217.GD1709@1wt.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1486 Lines: 31 On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 09:32:18PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Was the problem that they were not synced at poweron or that they would > > drift due to power-states? > > They resynced at power up, but would constantly drift. I don't even know > if it was caused by power states. When the machine was loaded, a single > task moving across the cores could see its time jump back and forth > several times a second by an offset sometimes close to +2/-2s. That sounds like C1, to me. > > Did you try running with idle=poll, to avoid ever entering C1 state (hlt)? > > Yes, I remember trying such things. I also tried 'nohlt', completely > disabling power management, including ACPI, etc... I also tried vanilla > kernels as well as severely patched ones, but the problem remained the > same in all circumstances, that only 'notsc' could solve. That's exceedingly strange. On my dual-socket dual-core, I can get roughly synced TSCs (no appreciable drift) by just using idle=poll. If that did not work for you, I'd really want to poke at the system more. > BTW, I've just found a remain of dmesg capture after boot in case you'd > like to look for anything in it. A dmesg won't be that useful, I'd actually have to poke at the system. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/