Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964810AbWJ1ULl (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Oct 2006 16:11:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964813AbWJ1ULl (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Oct 2006 16:11:41 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:13275 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964810AbWJ1ULl (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Oct 2006 16:11:41 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: Willy Tarreau Subject: Re: AMD X2 unsynced TSC fix? Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 13:11:14 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Lee Revell , thockin@hockin.org, Luca Tettamanti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, john stultz References: <1161969308.27225.120.camel@mindpipe> <200610281233.27588.ak@suse.de> <20061028200439.GB1603@1wt.eu> In-Reply-To: <20061028200439.GB1603@1wt.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200610281311.14665.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1683 Lines: 42 On Saturday 28 October 2006 13:04, Willy Tarreau wrote: > I really think that the hardware was doing tricks far beyond my knowledge, > because on another Sun (a V40Z), there were 4 dual cores which I never saw > out of sync even after hours of testing. But the HPET was available in it, > I don't remember if it's used by default when detected. I think some system occasionally ramp the clock for thermal management, but that should be rare. > No I did not "force" anything at first. You take the RHEL3 CD, you install > it, reboot and watch your logs report negative times, then scratch your > head, first call red hat dumb ass, and after a few tests, apologize to the > poor innocent red hat Well they should have fixed the kernel to fall back to another clock by backporting the appropiate fixes from mainline. I assume they did actually. > and call the box a total crap. To put it shortly > (might be useful for people who Google for it) : Dual-core Sun x2100 is > unreliable out of the box under Linux. No that shouldn't be true with any modern kernel. It will just fallback to HPET or more likely PMtimer. > > > In the default configuration there shouldn't be any problems > > like this, it will just run slower because the kernel falls back to a > > slower time source. > > You have to specify "notsc" for this. No, the kernel should work out of the box. Some older kernels didn't at various points of time though. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/