Received: by 2002:a05:6520:4211:b029:f4:110d:56bc with SMTP id o17csp1547708lkv; Wed, 19 May 2021 12:29:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxHIYfwMrWYs6gw2SUiQcKWNFibVEyvNvPI8j1NFrGkZaGTptnSTQPh7hz8QnM8Uy3/TkuR X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:581:: with SMTP id c1mr697592ils.37.1621452572313; Wed, 19 May 2021 12:29:32 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1621452572; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=fnRM0YUTDRTuCmNj/BKPk+YKkkaYWPgjfKH4k1L2zp4Axze2c1lDZeiIX+z/WQ13D+ 58eDiXKDrjY9K4RafdvMI27OIo92fLnlvxCHHBzTD3Ocb34EruIhwHCQTZ8SOdVtBcmv wom/xl4twxDMqyPHg+87nJshO623j/6GPvwPheAjFjavB8zdWk7oOJmzp0sPGvdNuLuA pUy536mMesCauqWbA2Ft+vKQO0kJnvOlmNAbb8A9kZYDqCS0ExjbJzjOcN2viRBsr/fQ saDO796BIj9W1zGgNzyCH8ccawVjanJCe5/doj5pXpA2duET8Jh1JAQ1ennvvE0NQO1p JpSA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=PG2I5eSwH1gLdSeaoNteIZrDs2CxfZW0OQAea/eYbuw=; b=QVdZJ+zJIq4D9oO9be3VOsMjCpI2twSWizPj7zW3l07QirtDlHWKfMMZRvI9TbxZfH vFBkQDhbjV6FT8qUq7G+KUdoImMH+xePPVM5KHThfRImPK+0pMLShHhTCY41cWd+wrwx Gx37M30JYanbOI5m+dzL3rCsxFjvubiN5y2kvVpmz7cFB2pAZInHhd2IJO1R4V+HVVMI Fm0kFnCvjg5JHl5L00GqinCtv39AhrTdXkcQrRB45N3bFZbzm+E6hy5TgeFxafiD9maP QmkXeBKKv1DAqE5JbVKSuzcoNgboMv/m/GnPou8NydSzsHw6axnTXmrWSRMbjbR6+8/j Q2nA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=8bytes.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f7si209962jat.71.2021.05.19.12.29.19; Wed, 19 May 2021 12:29:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=8bytes.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240432AbhESLfK (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 19 May 2021 07:35:10 -0400 Received: from 8bytes.org ([81.169.241.247]:39854 "EHLO theia.8bytes.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229554AbhESLfJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2021 07:35:09 -0400 Received: by theia.8bytes.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 689F82FA; Wed, 19 May 2021 13:33:48 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 13:33:46 +0200 From: 'Joerg Roedel' To: Joerg Roedel Cc: Juergen Gross , David Laight , "x86@kernel.org" , Hyunwook Baek , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , "hpa@zytor.com" , Andy Lutomirski , Dave Hansen , Peter Zijlstra , Jiri Slaby , Dan Williams , Tom Lendacky , Kees Cook , David Rientjes , Cfir Cohen , Erdem Aktas , Masami Hiramatsu , Mike Stunes , Sean Christopherson , Martin Radev , Arvind Sankar , "linux-coco@lists.linux.dev" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86/sev-es: Use __put_user()/__get_user Message-ID: References: <20210512075445.18935-1-joro@8bytes.org> <20210512075445.18935-4-joro@8bytes.org> <0496626f018d4d27a8034a4822170222@AcuMS.aculab.com> <92244e37-4443-98bd-24aa-bf59548aab47@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 11:32:35AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 10:58:20AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: > > No, those were used before, but commit 9da3f2b7405440 broke Xen's use > > case. That is why I did commit 1457d8cf7664f. > > [...] > > Having the distinction between user and kernel memory accesses > explicitly in the code seems to be the most robust solution. On the other hand, as I found out today, 9da3f2b7405440 had a short life-time and got reverted upstream. So using __get_user()/__put_user() should be fine in this code path. It just deserves a comment explaining its use here and why pagefault_enable()/disable() is not needed. Even the get_kernel* helpers use __get_user_size() internally. Regards, Joerg