Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Sender: faiyazm=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org E2438C43460
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] mm: slub: move sysfs slab alloc/free interfaces to
 debugfs
To:     Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc:     cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com,
        iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, vbabka@suse.cz,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        glittao@gmail.com, vinmenon@codeaurora.org
References: <1621341949-26762-1-git-send-email-faiyazm@codeaurora.org>
 <YKPBFn26BlPJZn0t@kroah.com>
From:   Faiyaz Mohammed <faiyazm@codeaurora.org>
Message-ID: <ddc70189-39a0-04b3-8d89-57cb524792df@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Wed, 19 May 2021 16:18:20 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.10.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <YKPBFn26BlPJZn0t@kroah.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On 5/18/2021 6:58 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 06:15:49PM +0530, Faiyaz Mohammed wrote:
>> alloc_calls and free_calls implementation in sysfs have two issues,
>> one is PAGE_SIZE limitiation of sysfs and other is it does not adhere
>> to "one value per file" rule.
>>
>> To overcome this issues, move the alloc_calls and free_calls implemeation
>> to debugfs.
>>
>> Rename the alloc_calls/free_calls to alloc_traces/free_traces,
>> to be inline with what it does.
>>
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Faiyaz Mohammed <faiyazm@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/slub_def.h |   8 ++
>>  mm/slab_common.c         |   9 ++
>>  mm/slub.c                | 359 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>  3 files changed, 294 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
> 
> If this is v6, what happened in v1-5?  That should always be below the
> --- line, right?
> 
Will update in next patch version.

Thanks and regards,
Mohammed Faiyaz