Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/67] KVM: X86: TDX support
To:     isaku.yamahata@intel.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     isaku.yamahata@gmail.com
References: <cover.1605232743.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
From:   Connor Kuehl <ckuehl@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <3edc0fb2-d552-88df-eead-9e2b80e79be4@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 May 2021 11:37:23 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <cover.1605232743.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 11/16/20 12:25 PM, isaku.yamahata@intel.com wrote:
> From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
> 
> * What's TDX?
> TDX stands for Trust Domain Extensions which isolates VMs from
> the virtual-machine manager (VMM)/hypervisor and any other software on
> the platform. [1]
> For details, the specifications, [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], are
> available.
> 
> 
> * The goal of this RFC patch
> The purpose of this post is to get feedback early on high level design
> issue of KVM enhancement for TDX. The detailed coding (variable naming
> etc) is not cared of. This patch series is incomplete (not working).
> Although multiple software components, not only KVM but also QEMU,
> guest Linux and virtual bios, need to be updated, this includes only
> KVM VMM part. For those who are curious to changes to other
> component, there are public repositories at github. [8], [9]

Hi,

I'm planning on reading through this patch set; but before I do, since
it's been several months and it's a non-trivially sized series, I just
wanted to confirm that this is the latest revision of the RFC that
you'd like comments on. Or, if there's a more recent series that I've
missed, I would be grateful for a pointer to it.

Thanks,

Connor