Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Sender: Ingo Molnar <mingo.kernel.org@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 May 2021 13:29:29 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To:     "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] x86/syscall: use int for x86-64 system calls
Message-ID: <YKT2mW0xVZltBOSh@gmail.com>
References: <20210518191303.4135296-1-hpa@zytor.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210518191303.4135296-1-hpa@zytor.com>
Precedence: bulk


* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:

> From: "H. Peter Anvin (Intel)" <hpa@zytor.com>
> 
> This patchset addresses several inconsistencies in the handling of
> system call numbers in x86-64 (and x32).

>  arch/x86/entry/common.c                         |  93 +++--
>  arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S                       |   2 +-
>  arch/x86/include/asm/syscall.h                  |   2 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/x86/syscall_numbering.c | 488 +++++++++++++++++++++---
>  4 files changed, 508 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)

Thanks Peter - this series is really nice now, and I agree that this 
inconsistency should be fixed.

Thanks,

	Ingo