Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp1877364pxj; Wed, 19 May 2021 16:28:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyvMsKkg7eLTVo/O8M0rcTPjERKsKWwMjw0vauWU0w7gb2SZcgIo87kNWz47NH114GJhIow X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3546:: with SMTP id f6mr1643302edd.267.1621466931416; Wed, 19 May 2021 16:28:51 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1621466931; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Vlv9rFkTowVrh9Z1WtYi71FfSrrSPQ4gU9581XTcZByT1GPPDPklVMg2JnKRuoAdks 9PNUBnh0cWTGTmmtba7p18OliVdEBuos7RZ0aqxh5/5vVliSU7zxaPKu8p5z0zJHjwhQ C8gkDRxzTV4JGtOtdB7Sjc1kDlOms4zOf3cMHuOMKvvO+odz5reXDmkhYT21DrTXS7FE 6GdUm3BEZZlvtwoEhHkf2z9DV9CHPXiYFb8i12DYPaJg2jznlAhPF+bTFbyJ9Gnd8j35 /GnC30r5+TUl9u4W9yROPY5Ir254ROcZ9Mu6V4Y7YznRNwItDkKwlVX0/T9KiNeofDYQ wG1Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=bxZcYYmyWxAd2KgaatHVdsQZhrW5sq/Io2MFiasBWic=; b=XUhN7F9Ut8gXHYcDK7dMi2B27ebEZ/1VdqB9wVmGjVXqpT5a1l4m+V0cr16PrDRU7J PXP2hrM8iKl5EwPV9F3PhO6B40Y9Dqoo6CTcJvdhOd9Me127wshQQYBIIm3kmDOwnMX4 +BxKM/3hurPSRkBlL+OCuNMiKE7OubVpwlAy7TZ5d9TYzP2BnxBAjW33D9ZCHVtxOeiL c1h/AV5CiamoKiH57bVFUJtyHF9sr2gYmoTpD1R/rcydVwtmyje2FVWwtnZsTy6hIiLq 6AV83Dx9kPAj/F2pVg2k9AGZ0ytCAk84vblhy25gH1jIOkcmXNaH94LmTfsZ3gh4EnBU aSbg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m14si609775edr.306.2021.05.19.16.28.28; Wed, 19 May 2021 16:28:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230031AbhESX21 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 19 May 2021 19:28:27 -0400 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([185.11.138.130]:40218 "EHLO gloria.sntech.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229518AbhESX2Z (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2021 19:28:25 -0400 Received: from ip5f5aa64a.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([95.90.166.74] helo=diego.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ljVae-0003Mu-T8; Thu, 20 May 2021 01:27:00 +0200 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= To: Linus Walleij Cc: Rob Herring , Jianqun Xu , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] gpio/rockchip: always enable clock for gpio controller Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 01:27:00 +0200 Message-ID: <3790260.ZaRXLXkqSa@diego> In-Reply-To: References: <20210510063602.505829-1-jay.xu@rock-chips.com> <7622756.lOV4Wx5bFT@phil> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Donnerstag, 20. Mai 2021, 01:18:24 CEST schrieb Linus Walleij: > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 10:49 PM Heiko Stuebner wrote: > > Am Montag, 10. Mai 2021, 08:37:22 CEST schrieb Jianqun Xu: > > > Since gate and ungate pclk of gpio has very litte benifit for system > > > power consumption, just keep it always ungate. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jianqun Xu > > > > Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner > > > > I do agree with the reasoning and as an added benefit, we > > also drop all the clk_enable calls that don't do proper error > > handling right now ;-) > > Heiko what is your general stance on the rest of the patches? > I was thinking I should merge them soon if you're not > against. I'm definitly in favor of them :-) I haven't seen any major issues, but sadly also haven't found the time to really dig deeper into the other patches. One thing pinctrl/gpio maintainer will need to check is if the +#include "../pinctrl/core.h" +#include "../pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.h" (in patch 3) is actually the right way to go. Heiko