Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210512210316.1982416-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210512210316.1982416-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 20 May 2021 01:50:50 +0200
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZpm4w6Ym2p9xTsYpkU7CR531aLUUxXj54tssoqd6c9=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Add device HID for new AMD GPIO controller
To:     Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>, Sachi King <nakato@nakato.io>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 11:03 PM Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com> wrote:

> Add device HID AMDI0031 to the AMD GPIO controller driver match table.
> This controller can be found on Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 devices and
> seems similar enough that we can just copy the existing AMDI0030 entry.
>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.10+

Why? It's hardly a regression?

> Tested-by: Sachi King <nakato@nakato.io>
> Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>

I've applied the patch for next without the stable tag for now.

Yours,
Linus Walleij