Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp1965153pxj; Wed, 19 May 2021 19:09:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyGK3JSqMWiIXSwOR3wgPHLwOj6HOQDX9nPXZhb8mCH9TL396uWfok5PRDDzSpSYDvo2XeQ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:27c6:: with SMTP id c6mr2353611ede.200.1621476556785; Wed, 19 May 2021 19:09:16 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1621476556; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XTtTHdS7DhXCytReI4T4fI4dgPN9IOfHNBOU4BCS4xttAdtbI7IeiM3XkYUJfwaevS 52RUREm4rg4OAf91IBlIsqkpc25s5MgRYipv7YbBdhLrBLUDplZd5emVD+S/4tPU8IL3 i+ebu1Mj7HYejlkXPVebZv1wJwwkDlwDxPV+uLUJ6qZQoyNLWTSRCa+gFPEx0LiLhQRZ fHyR8tjwRaazPNlmdQrls8WmnBBdDFzTKeLtjWmR9Hhy2AXZfXCUwKBLwn0FOjGVpUHI pYpb3jK/JIeaNHx1UHZr8sgO6pjJJNDPJtk9p1avUn8lItdu6mfcT22B6IehnxNi08Yu XP9w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=M6cRLqzaHgfBxmfENbAvNsKknuHty3QcUNhL5s8vjLE=; b=r5GaRarwjj2D2R1B5zAwueFMqe45bJislxXczOrKlS5dIcL4GYbClOmfj+MXJtydT5 KFmpJ/fnn7VwO1TUBDoGIoLNajRAoWtujPLkv3NWG/ofZvszDmoeLkzlmN1BUtgRM0mJ SE/ctTm/+sY1zO8fDEGWjlxfmqHffvZgxwYGFcN1F4j3sZY7cc3W/9OiPxf5D9pJqZyr ZhcrvFUwU3wzjgCEccGHt7Dq+Kytn781BJ0Vcp7gkdGN5na2vopwvUOWjyWklp/2vF4s tmtPC21fiCU334CZZyIkTZiCYbwpDTpXQ2AnI9K/E9HLf/lLv2WBd9L1vb1WuRaoTXdX slkA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bj9si1335895ejb.518.2021.05.19.19.08.52; Wed, 19 May 2021 19:09:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229952AbhETCGp (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 19 May 2021 22:06:45 -0400 Received: from netrider.rowland.org ([192.131.102.5]:59513 "HELO netrider.rowland.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S230232AbhETCGn (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2021 22:06:43 -0400 Received: (qmail 1187236 invoked by uid 1000); 19 May 2021 22:05:21 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 22:05:21 -0400 From: Alan Stern To: Matthias Kaehlcke Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Rob Herring , Frank Rowand , Michal Simek , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Douglas Anderson , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Peter Chen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd , Ravi Chandra Sadineni , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Bastien Nocera , Al Cooper , "Alexander A. Klimov" , Masahiro Yamada Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/5] USB: misc: Add onboard_usb_hub driver Message-ID: <20210520020521.GB1186755@rowland.harvard.edu> References: <20210511225223.550762-1-mka@chromium.org> <20210511155152.v10.2.I7c9a1f1d6ced41dd8310e8a03da666a32364e790@changeid> <20210518194511.GA1137841@rowland.harvard.edu> <20210519144356.GB1165692@rowland.harvard.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 04:07:17PM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 10:43:56AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 02:40:47PM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > > > > > > Could you also have a look at "[4/5] usb: host: xhci-plat: > > > Create platform device for onboard hubs in probe()" > > > (https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1425453/)? It's a > > > relatively short patch that creates the platform device for > > > the driver from xhci-plat as you suggested in the v4 > > > discussion. > > > > I'm not the maintainer for xhci-related drivers. > > > > However, there is at least one thing about this patch which looks > > suspicious: Adding the onboard_hub_dev pointer to struct usb_hcd instead > > of to struct xhci_plat_priv, where it would make a lot more sense. > > I can move it to struct usb_hcd if that's preferred Thinko: The patch already has it in struct usb_hcd. I suggested moving it to struct xhci_plat_priv. Alan Stern