Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210520114851.1274609-1-clabbe@baylibre.com> <20210520114851.1274609-2-clabbe@baylibre.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210520114851.1274609-2-clabbe@baylibre.com>
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 20 May 2021 17:24:26 +0200
Message-ID: <CACRpkda6ou1SJZzBwHXN_kWofnFw8w7XAkr7VcFO2NrqbQug_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: partitions: redboot: fix style issues
To:     Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com>
Cc:     Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Miqu=C3=A8l_Raynal?= <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
        Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 1:49 PM Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com> wrote:

> This patch fixes easy checkpatch issues.
>
> Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com>
(...)
> -    uint32_t     flash_base;    // Address within FLASH of image
(...)
> +       u32       flash_base;    // Address within FLASH of image

Does checkpatch complain about this? At one point the MTD maintainer
disliked the u32/u16/u8 types and explicitly wanted to use the C
standard library types, and it's the kind of eccentric maintainer
deviations we accommodate for.

From my personal side:
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij