Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 20 May 2021 17:59:25 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Joseph Richey <joerichey94@gmail.com>
Cc:     trivial@kernel.org, Joe Richey <joerichey@google.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
        Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>,
        Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-accelerators@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Don't use BIT() macro in UAPI headers
Message-ID: <YKaHUudJx2FJ2sO/@zn.tnic>
References: <20210520104343.317119-1-joerichey94@gmail.com>
 <YKZC9o8019kH76xS@zn.tnic>
 <CAAXkRocqFZgC-pWLc3V+VQLAVRvLXk+wTOhp+F4_WGRByjxhDQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAAXkRocqFZgC-pWLc3V+VQLAVRvLXk+wTOhp+F4_WGRByjxhDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 04:50:11AM -0700, Joseph Richey wrote:
> Running checkpatch.pl with --strict gives:

Yah, people must *remember* to use --strict.

> It should probably just recommend the _BITUL macro.

Right.

> Ahhhhh, I figured there was a more standard way. Will fix.

Yeah, Fixes: is very useful, as we've come to realize.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette