Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932290AbWJ3OX2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2006 09:23:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751771AbWJ3OX2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2006 09:23:28 -0500 Received: from mailhub.sw.ru ([195.214.233.200]:43187 "EHLO relay.sw.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751769AbWJ3OX1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2006 09:23:27 -0500 Message-ID: <454609DE.9060901@openvz.org> Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:19:10 +0300 From: Pavel Emelianov User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Jackson CC: vatsa@in.ibm.com, dev@openvz.org, sekharan@us.ibm.com, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, balbir@in.ibm.com, haveblue@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, matthltc@us.ibm.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, rohitseth@google.com, menage@google.com Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] Resource Management - Infrastructure choices References: <20061030103356.GA16833@in.ibm.com> <20061030024320.962b4a88.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20061030024320.962b4a88.pj@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1364 Lines: 46 Paul Jackson wrote: > vatsa wrote: >> C. Paul Menage's container patches >> >> Provides a generic heirarchial ... >> >> Consensus/Debated Points >> ------------------------ >> >> Consensus: >> ... >> - Dont support heirarchy for now > > Looks like this item can be dropped from the concensus ... ;). Agree. > > I for one would recommend getting the hierarchy right from the > beginning. > > Though I can appreciate that others were trying to "keep it simple" > and postpone dealing with such complications. I don't agree. > > Such stuff as this deeply affects all that sits on it. Get the I can share our experience with it. Hierarchy support over beancounters was done in one patch. This patch altered only three places - charge/uncharge routines, beancounter creation/destruction code and BC's /proc entry. All the rest code was not modified. My point is that a good infrastrucure doesn't care wether or not beancounter (group controller) has a parent. > basic data shape presented by the kernel-user API right up front. > The rest will follow, much easier. > > Good review of the choices - thanks. > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/